User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof/Archives/2016/July

FYI Sockpuppet investigations/NorthBySouthBaranof
Hi. I moved the SPI from talkpage to main, because — while there's a reason IPs aren't allowed to create SPIs — I thought a CU might as well take a look, especially since you seemed interested in a CU being done. But then I realized it was block evasion, not merely as assumed from 64.60.29.234, which Ponyo has blocked for six months as a proxy, but also as recent and obvious evasion of Ponyo's block by 2602:301:772D:62D0:40B9:3F54:9A7B:A4D0. So I deleted it. I'll block the 2602 IP now. Bishonen &#124; talk 10:02, 26 June 2016 (UTC).
 * I'm a bit disappointed! I was looking forward to a small bit of vindication. Dumuzid (talk) 11:18, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, Ponyo is a checkuser, Dumuzid, you might try asking her to run a check all the same. Under the circumstances, possibly she will, though I know the CU's don't usually do it for the purpose of vindication.


 * Incidentally, NBSB, I'm not too impressed by your claim that socking is literally impossible because the two of you once edited within a minute of each other, here and here. User:Darwinbish and I once edited actually in the same minute, though I can't find these edits now (I wonder if there's a tool? Is there, my little Ponyo?). She's definitely my sock. Bishonen &#124; talk 11:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC).
 * Aha, then there is proof of your nefarious perfidy! My socks Dumuzid, PeterTheFourth, Johnuniq, Drmies, Jimbo Wales and the entire population of Boring, Oregon shall certainly learn from your experience. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:19, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Johnuniq? I'm impressed, or at least Darwinbish is. You have some fine socks! How about the population of Fucking, Austria? Bishonen &#124; talk 14:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC).
 * Your wish etc. (55 − 16 = 39 seconds time difference):
 * Bishonen 2012-08-23 11:36:16
 * Darwinbish 2012-08-23 11:36:55
 * Johnuniq (talk) 02:23, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hahaha, great, thank you, John! I think you, too, must have posted pretty much simultaneously as me going on wikibreak, which is why I didn't see it till now. (Does that prove you're my sock, or that you're not? Not sure — it's getting quite confusing.) It's neat with the seconds, though also they slightly deflate my magic. I only saw the minutes, myself. So, is there a tool for finding the confluence, and finding the seconds? I mean something little old ladies can use? Probably not. Bishonen &#124; talk 15:48, 7 July 2016 (UTC).

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Katietalk 12:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

notice that you reverted on Peter Gleick
I received a notice that you had reverted my edit on Peter Gleick. Do you know why that would have occurred? From my reading, you didn't revert me at all, but instead created a new variant. Thanx for any insight. Poodleboy (talk) 05:12, 10 July 2016 (UTC)