User talk:NorthBySouthBaranof/Archives/2019/April

Overstepping boundaries
Please do not revert any material based on personal opinion and biases. Your deletion earlier on the list of fake news sites is a violation of Wikipedia rules and conduct and you're overstepping your boundaries. I won't report you this time, but please refrain from blindly deleting we're headed in articles without reading their sources or starting a discussion on the Talk page. You'll be reported next time you do this. CoopDEtat19 (talk) 14:17, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm overstepping nothing, and you're welcome to "report" anything you want. The fact of the matter is that the sources you cite don't say BuzzFeed is "fake news," and absent that, you can't just declare them to be so because you think it's true. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 14:28, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Re: Overstepping Boundaries
If the rule of 1 fake news story not making an Outlook fake news, then most of this page needs to be deleted... If you actually look at the reasons as to why these Outlets are listed, it is mostly based on one news article. What you're doing is taking personal bias and feelings and trumping them over reliable resources such as NBC News. CoopDEtat19 (talk) 14:32, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

1RR violation on Richard B. Spencer
You realize that you violated it (one, two), right? I'll give you a brief moment to self-revert. El_C 00:06, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Please examine the edits more closely — they are edits to different parts of the article. I did not put Neo-Nazism back in the lede (that would have indeed been a violation); rather, I put it in the infobox. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 00:11, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh wait, my bad, I didn't realize the first edit had it in the infobox; the lede was the only place I had seen it. Self-reverted. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 00:12, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Scott Pruitt
Hello, Would you kindly take a moment to see the post I made in the talk section of the article on Scott Pruitt? I raised a similar concern that someone else had made independently, last year, to which you replied. Yet theirs came from an IP address rather than a regular account, and I hope I expressed the concern a little more clearly. I did not change anything on the idea that someone might like to address it. thanksArgentine84 (talk) 21:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)