User talk:North Alabama 000

Welcome!

 * }

Minnie Pearl
Hi. I reverted your edit to the Minnie Pearl article. Your terminology of "parallel-type sequel" might be technically correct, but "comic" has far more meaning for me as a reader. It is likely that the whole passage in the article would benefit from rewording. Perhaps you could start a discussion on the article talk page....

In considering this, please remember that article content is supposed to be based on what others have published elsewhere -- not our own judgments as contributors. --Orlady (talk) 20:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * (In response to Ms. Orlady's kind comment above: A couple of days afterward she placed an improved version of my proposed-but-flawed edit into the "Minnie Pearl" page, which was better IAW our high quality standards) North Alabama 000 (talk) 17:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

I withdraw my objection
If you feel that the link to Gospel harmony is useful, I withdraw my objection. We want Wikipedia to allow people to find things, even those whose conceptual links are different than mine. Pete unseth (talk) 22:48, 20 November 2016 (UTC)