User talk:Northernwatcher

Could you explain the inclusion of anonymous reviews to this site?

There are a lot of teachers and faculty who do not get the opportunity to voice their opinions without suffering major consequences, which is why it's anonymous.

Moreover, the page has concerning issues including the fact that it is marked as an "ad-like" page with many claims which are contradicted by many anonymous staff reviews.

I think its imperative for an international school's wiki page to include a section that addresses both student and faculty culture/life. Maybe its a matter of presenting such a section in a different manner.

July 2020
Your addition to Hong Kong Academy has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Meters (talk) 04:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hong Kong Academy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Don't restore this. Per WP:BRD please discuss this on the article's talk page. We don't report on things that school employees do that do not involve the school directly. There is no indication this was done at the school or at a school event, or that it involved students from the school. People do all sorts of immoral, unethical, or illegal acts but they are not germane to a person's employer's article unless the act directly involves the company. The mere fact that a teacher who was briefly at the school was involved in collecting or distributing does not warrant mentioning, and more than it would if he had been guilty of adultery, or drunk driving, or assault, or robbing a bank, or any other non school-related activity.'' Meters (talk) 22:19, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Hong Kong Academy, you may be blocked from editing. ''I see that not only did you restore the original challenged content, you added additional details in an attempt to show a connection to the school: "Students at Hong Kong Academy recall Stern being allowed to use his own private laptop, which he always had facing away from the class, and was known for hugging young students in a creepy manner." Since the source you added to support the statement says nothing at all about this I conclude that this was not a good faith edit.

You are a WP:SPA on this article. Please read WP:COI and disclose whether you have a conflict of interest in this article.'' Meters (talk) 22:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)