User talk:Northerstar1

'Pawistik Lodge' listed for deletion
A page that you have been involved in editing, Pawistik Lodge, has been listed for deletion; you may wish to participate in the deletion discussion. Thanks. StaticGull Talk  15:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * According to wikipedia policy, it is wise to show how other sources discuss a topic. The more places ie newspapers, books,  magazines, other websites which discuss the artticle content, the more notable it becomes, and more worthy of being listed in the wikipedia encyclopedia.  The more references and inline citations an article posesses the better.  There is interesting information in this article, and with less tourism type information and with expansion it may come to be an article.  I tried to find another fishing lodge on wikipedia and I couldn't  There are these fishing articles.  You may wish to ask for help here at the wikiproject on fishingSriMesh |  talk  02:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Pawistik Lodge
A tag has been placed on Pawistik Lodge, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Pawistik Lodge and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Fremte (talk) 20:10, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Pawistik Lodge
it's not "your" entry nor "your" article. Please familiarize yourself with wikipedia. It is not for advertising. it is an encyclopedia. The major htoel chains your mention meet wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. --Fremte (talk) 18:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I think it might be better to have a small paragraph in an article on the Sturgeon-Weir River which as a geographic feature is inherently notable. Maybe we will have a merge there.  --Fremte (talk) 18:08, 27 March 2009 (UTC)