User talk:Northjersey

I will not recreate deleted articles anymore.

Crack Epidemic
To answer your question, WikiProject_Stub_sorting/List_of_stubs has the full list of stub types; as far as I can tell, the best one would be. However, I'm not sure that this topic merits it's own article (though admittedly I don't know much about it). It may be more appropriate to merge any additional content with Cocaine.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The crack epidemic severly affected new york city in the 1980s. The epidemic is mentioned by name in several articles. Example, Wahington heights, if you scroll all the way down. Also, here is another article that explains how it was officially classified by the DEA, http://www.senate.gov/~schumer/SchumerWebsite/pressroom/press_releases/2004/PR02593.Crystalmethsunpres042504.html http://www.streetdrugs.org/crack.htm Northjersey 21:07, 6 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm not denying its existence; it's just that I wasn't convinced that it needed its own article. It's already mentioned in the Cocaine article; why not add a few sentences there? The two sources you cite only mention it in passing, and don't say much about it other then when it occurred and to what extent usage increased.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:13, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi, the current article looks pretty good. I think you've come up with enough content to reasonably justify having it's own article. I don't think it needs the stub tag anymore, though it probably makes sense to add a category tag or two.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:16, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

RE: Crack Epidemic
It's on my watchlist, I'll revert any other vandalism they make. ShakingSpirit talk 17:24, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Purple Haze (cannabis) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Purple Haze (cannabis) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Purple Haze (cannabis) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mjpresson (talk) 03:13, 22 May 2011 (UTC)