User talk:Northtoft

Your edits to Moorsholm
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

Keith D (talk) 09:55, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Please explain copyright infringement assertion. Harkey (talk) 12:21, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Moorsholm
You removed content from Moorsholm in this edit with the edit summary "Copyright infringement", however you did not state what you believed it to be a copyright infringement of, and a search on Google found nothing except the article, and a copy on DBpedia, which sources its information from Wikipedia. If you believe any content of the article is a copyright infringement, please specify where it is from, either on the article, using the copyvio template:, or mentioning the source on the talk page, so that it can be checked. Snydale (talk) 12:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Warning.svg|25px]] Again please do not delete content without reason, you have indicated in summary copyright violation but you have not explained where the page is a violation of. Please do not remove the text again without providing detail of the problem on the talk page of the article, giving detail of the site that you think the page is a violation of. This can then be investigated and appropriate action taken. If you persist without a valid reason then you may be blocked for disruptive editing. Thank you. Keith D (talk) 10:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)