User talk:Noseamuseos

Template:Bulgarian Political Parties
Hi, I noticed that you added the number of seats each party won in Sunday's election. Could you please tell me your source? I thought the Central Electoral Commission wasn't going to release the official results until Thursday? Thank you! -- Kndimov (talk) 17:45, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=628700695 your edit] to Alternative for Bulgarian Revival may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The Alternative for Bulgarian Revival Алтернатива за българско възраждане, АБВ; Alternativa za balgarsko vazrazhdane, ABV

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Cyrillic script seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:34, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Southeast Europe
Your new changes in article of Southeast Europe has been reverted because- southeast-europe.net is not reliable source. Map on page concerns "South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme", not geographical things. Also, Slovakia and Austria (see map in source) lies in South East Europe? Absurd. According to Wikipedia:CYCLE, before new controversial changes must to be discuss and consensus. PS. Please not continue the edit-war. Subtropical -man  talk   (en-2)   23:09, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
 * discuss is here: Talk:Southeast_Europe. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   23:26, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Georgi Terziev
Hi, we do not need the category "Bulgarian people" on this article because it is what is called a container category for more specific categories. The fact that we have the categories "People from Sliven" and "Bulgarian footballers" removes the need for this category on this article. Also, nowhere in the article is there a reliable source for the religious categories that you added back, articles especially on living people need proof of their religion from a reliable source. &#39;&#39;&#39;tAD&#39;&#39;&#39; (talk) 02:10, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Category:Bulgarian people is redundant as The Almightey Drill notes above. ... disco spinster   talk  02:17, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Your recent editing history at Georgi Terziev shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ... disco spinster   talk  02:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)