User talk:NotOrrio/Archives/ 2

Your GA nomination of Jordanville railway station
The article Jordanville railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jordanville railway station for comments about the article, and Talk:Jordanville railway station/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZKang123 -- ZKang123 (talk) 07:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of City Loop
The article City Loop you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:City Loop for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 07:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mount Waverley railway station
The article Mount Waverley railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mount Waverley railway station for comments about the article, and Talk:Mount Waverley railway station/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DimensionalFusion -- DimensionalFusion (talk) 13:01, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Parliament railway station
The article Parliament railway station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Parliament railway station for comments about the article, and Talk:Parliament railway station/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The person who loves reading -- The person who loves reading (talk) 14:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Clayton railway station, Melbourne
The article Clayton railway station, Melbourne you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Clayton railway station, Melbourne for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Syndal railway station
The article Syndal railway station you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Syndal railway station for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kj cheetham -- Kj cheetham (talk) 18:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Glen Waverley railway station
The article Glen Waverley railway station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Glen Waverley railway station and Talk:Glen Waverley railway station/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kj cheetham -- Kj cheetham (talk) 10:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Glen Waverley railway station
The article Glen Waverley railway station you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Glen Waverley railway station for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kj cheetham -- Kj cheetham (talk) 16:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Melbourne Airport railway line
Hello, NotOrrio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Melbourne Airport railway line, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Clayton railway station, Melbourne
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clayton railway station, Melbourne you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JML1148 -- JML1148 (talk) 01:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Clayton railway station, Melbourne
The article Clayton railway station, Melbourne you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Clayton railway station, Melbourne and Talk:Clayton railway station, Melbourne/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JML1148 -- JML1148 (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Melbourne Airport railway line


Hello, NotOrrio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Melbourne Airport railway line".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:49, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Clayton railway station, Melbourne
The article Clayton railway station, Melbourne you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Clayton railway station, Melbourne for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JML1148 -- JML1148 (talk) 22:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:TemplateWikiProject Australian Transport
Hello, NotOrrio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TemplateWikiProject Australian Transport, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Arden, Victoria
Hello, NotOrrio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arden, Victoria, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)