User talk:NotTfue123

Not Tfue 123  (Talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: GoldStar (April 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GoldStar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:GoldStar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:GoldStar Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chetsford&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:GoldStar reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 04:00, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Socks
Why are you tagging sock accounts? Praxidicae (talk) 11:30, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of ProLink for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ProLink is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ProLink until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —— SerialNumber  54129  12:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 12:18, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Unblock
--UTRSBot (talk) 13:19, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Help
Yunshui 雲 水 !! The thing isn't that. I had good account standing account but I forgot it's username and password. But, I decided to make new account and contribute. Understand the problem. I would have done that but there is no chance that I can recover that account. I can to use my creativity, skills and talent which will contribute to make wikipedia more better. Not Tfue 123  (Talk)  13:23, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * A full list of former administrators can be found at Former administrators; perhaps that will jog your memory. We do not need your password, only your username. Yunshui 雲 水 15:07, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * User:Yunshui is remember to write article on

Unblock

 * This is now a CheckUser block.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:43, 9 April 2019 (UTC)