User talk:NotWith/archive 2011

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, NotWith! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions  or type  at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name  using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian ! Marek. 69    talk  14:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Instituto de Resseguros do Brasil
Hi NotWith, I just wanted to let you know that I took a look at your recently created article  Instituto de Resseguros do Brasil  -- The content seems well-organized.However, I noticed there are some holes that may need filling: the article currently does not contain any references. As a new article, the most important thing is to find reliable references for all existing information.It would be great if you could also upload a picture for the related article  Pool Re.

I'm kind of new here myself but let me know if there is any way I can help. Thanks, Amy Z ( talk  ) 15:26, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Catalebeda elegans
Please don't add unreferenced articles. Thanks,  Chzz    ►    21:46, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Page moves
Please stop moving pages without discussion. Failure to seek consensus before such changes can be seen as disruptive and may result in your being blocked from editing. -- Stemonitis ( talk  ) 00:07, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Some tips to help you out!
Hi, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)

First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first.

Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:  /Sandbox , that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.

For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers ( Chzz ).

Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations  :o)  It all helps.  Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type    on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work.

Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you.

One last thing to keep as a motto: "It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!" Pesky  (  talk   … stalk!  ) 09:50, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Simple references
These require two parts;


 * a)

Chzz is 98 years old.

He likes tea.


 * b) A section called "References" with the special code "   ";

Named references
Chzz was born in 1837.

Chzz lives in Footown.

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref  to see the result.

Citation templates
You can put anything you like between, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals.

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref  to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Here's a little bit of magic which can save you an awful lot of time and effort!
You might want to consider using this tool  - (tools:~dispenser/cgi-bin/webreflinks.py) - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates  for your links. All you do is install the script on Special:MyPage/common.js , or or  Special:MyPage/vector.js  , then paste the bare url (without [...] brackets) between your tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page! It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for pdf documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well all by itself.  For those it can't do by itself, it gives you a pull-down (or up) menu of templates to choose from, which you can then fill in manually.  Often the problem is "No title found" - sometimes the title is obvious (especially if it's a pdf), bit, if not, just open the page yourself and choose something appropriate if there's not already a clear title there. Happy editing!  Pesky   (  talk   … stalk!  ) 09:50, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

AN/I Notification
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents  regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Something we need to know!
NotWith, we need to know how you seem to be managing to find, open, edit and re-save hundreds of pages at an average of about a page a minute, on such things as wikilinking words; it also only seems to take two minutes to change from one keyword search to the next. We don;t think it would be possible for most people to have 50 or more tabls open at a time, in order to be able to get through these at the rate you were doing. On 8th October, for instance, (two days after registering with us), you opened, edited and re-saved ]http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&limit=200&target=NotWith nearly 200 pages between 08:02 and 14:28], for the most part at the rate of around one a minute, with apparently no breaks. Can you please let us know how this was done? Pesky  (  talk   … stalk!  ) 13:36, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I was apparently disambiguating the Orion, Pluto, Ganymede, Phobos, Deimos, Titan (etc.) disambiguation pages as all those words have in common to have at least a mythological and an astronomic aspect. To be quick I was using the what links here link present in the toolbox. As instructed in the Disambiguation template stating This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same title formed as a letter-number combination. If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article., a was adding a piped link to point to the different intended article (mythology or moon). That's the basic job of correcting links that point to disambiguation pages. I think plenty of people know that! Cheers! -- NotWith ( talk  ) 14:32, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, I can see what the changes were, OK (and therefore what you were doing); I was just wondering how you managed to work so quickly (first finding all the disambig links to fix, then fixing a page a minute for lots of the time) for about six and a half hours, without taking any kind of a break! Pages must load a lot faster for you than they do for me; by the time you've loaded them, edited them, checked your edit, saved them, waited for them to reload on saving before you can close them, and so on. You must have been having an awful lot of tabs open at any one time.  It seemed very expert, fast (and a bit unusual) work for an editor so new to Wikipedia.  Pesky   (  talk   … stalk!  ) 17:09, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Page moves
You have been warned before about making undiscussed page moves, and you are at it again, and making a royal mess of it, too. There are good reasons for using the disambiguator "(genus)". Please make no further page moves without establishing consensus for them first. Failure to do so may be considered disruptive editing, and could result in your being blocked (as happened with User:Nono64  ). -- Stemonitis ( talk  ) 16:32, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ  * Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Lamellar granule ( check to confirm  | fix with Dab solver  )
 * added a link pointing to Substrate


 * SB-431542 ( check to confirm  | fix with Dab solver  )
 * added a link pointing to Receptor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk  ) 10:28, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Chemistry categories
There is consensus among Wikipedia's chemists that there are already too many categories for types of phenols. (See, for example, a recent discussion here ). Please do not create any more chemistry categories without first getting consensus to do so at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry  or  Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemicals. Thank you. -- Ed ( Edgar181  ) 18:13, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Olga Alava
An article that you have been involved in editing, Olga Alava , has been proposed for a merge  with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Cloudz   679   20:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of :Blue alga
A tag has been placed on :Blue alga  requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources  that verify  their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit  the page's talk page directly  to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy  the page or email a copy to you. Night Of Darkness 07:25, 30 December 2011 (UTC)