User talk:Not Brit

 &empty; BRIT 

Barnstar
Hi, Not Brit. You deserve a barnstar.


 * Hey, look at that! I have been editing Wikipedia for years under a different handle (which shall remain secret) and never got one of these things. Three months into my new handle and shazaam! Thanks!

Why the removal
So out of curiousity. Why did you get rid of that other user's comments on here a moment ago? Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * REPLY He was repeating comments he had already made in other sections and the reply belonged in those sections. Plus, I thought it was boring.

Regarding your edit summary . ..
Well, yes, Not Brit, reading your edit summary, it seems clear that you didn't know the true race of Paul Tagliabue. Well, now you know. :-) Cheers!  Un  sch  ool  03:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Mark Hofmann
You appear to be engaged in an edit war at Mark Hofmann. You have both recently broken the three revert rule. Please cease reverting and work out your differences on the talk page, or the page may need to be protected and you may be blocked from editing.--Cúchullain t/ c 00:08, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I apologize and have made edits to the corresponding talk page.

Thank you Not Brit!
I noticed your input to the Mark Hoffman discussion page. I wanted to thank you sincerely. It seems that there are a lot of modern day "Missourians" (no offense to present day Missourians) who want to keep tarring and feathering Mormons. At times it seems that we are out there alone trying to defend our religion from the mud thrown at it. And when we do there is an instant attack that we are only omplaining because of our non-neutral POV based on our faith.

So when I read your response to John Foxe it was extremely refreshing. It's nice to know that others outside our faith will stand up to defend us against these unfair, insulting, and undignified attacks. You are a real peacemaker and won't be forgotten. Thanks for showing others what Christianity is supposed to be all about.

You're a modern day Good Samaritan.

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:New Orleans Pelicans.png
 Thanks for uploading File:New Orleans Pelicans.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 10 January 2017 (UTC)