User talk:Not this time

Not this time.

Refering to Editors on Wikipedia Articles
Adding that information is rather trivial and is not what is not considered a reference you add to Wikipedia articles. Please stop adding them, thank you.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 18:57, 7 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I didn't even know what a SPUI was, I just knew about the Wikipedia editor. The note is placed inbetween selfreference tags, so it should be fine, it won't appear on mirrors. Not this time 18:58, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * That information is considered trivial and it is nearly always avoided to self-reference to Wikipedia editors on namespace articles.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 18:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Why would it be trivial? SPUI is quite a prominent editor, and a note can't hurt. It's not displayed on mirrors anyway, and people who don't take an interest in it will just ignore it. And for the "Mackensen" entry, that's even more appropriate, because he's listed at the bottom of the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Not this time (talk • contribs)
 * Please stop or your account will face a block. Btw, interesting that a new user knows about "admin rollback"....¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk)  19:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm willing to stop, but you're abusing rollback in a content dispute, and start threatening with blocks instead of trying to discuss the matter. Not this time 19:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I am not abusing admin rollback. It is explicitly a self reference that is typically avoided and is considered vandalism to readd.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk)  19:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * It may be typically avoided, but it's definitely not "simple and obvious vandalism", so 3RR applies. See WP:AN3. Not this time 19:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * By the way I'm a she...not a he as you indicated there. We'll see how other administrators view this, since you view it as violation of reverting.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk)  19:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)