User talk:Notanipokay

WP:CTDAPE
Hi Notanipokay. I fixed your new shortcut, WP:CTDAPE, the other day. (See here and here). It wasn’t going directly to the section because the anchor had the same name as the section heading. To work, anchors cannot have the same name as any section heading in the article in which one is trying to set an anchor. I can’t say I got it in one; it took several tries. I came across it because I have WP:DE watchlisted. Thanks! —  Spike Toronto  23:34, 6 November 2010 (UTC)


 * thank you! i was having a hell of a time trying to figure the mechanics of that one out. Notanipokay (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * You’re welcome. It was new to me, but I could see it was not working, so I kept re-reading the Anchor material, and trying different attempts, until I got it right. —  Spike Toronto  07:14, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * By the way, I was wondering if we could come up with something a little more mnemonic than WP:CTDAPE? It’s a bit awkward. Since it’s on the disruptive editing page, what about WP:DEPE where DE=disruptive editing and PE=productive editors? Of course, we can have both! There’s no rule against more than one shortcut going to a policy section/page. What do you think of WP:DEPE? (It’s currently not in use.) Thanks! —  Spike Toronto  20:52, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * that sounds much better. go for it.99.168.87.155 (talk) 05:48, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


 * As a piece of friendly advice, now that you have a registered account, you should try to avoid editing without logging in (i.e., editing from an IP). In (article) talk namespace, it could be construed as sock puppetting. Also, it gives out personal information that you may not want others seeing. —  Spike Toronto  09:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


 * P.S. I’ll work on the alternate policy shortcut tomorrow. I have to get to bed now before I get served divorce papers! —  Spike Toronto  09:09, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅    With this edit and this . Thanks! —  Spike  Toronto  19:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:ZZ34C3F20B.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ZZ34C3F20B.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. [Truncated]... Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:11, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * i've contacted the owner of the image. haven't heard back yet, but then it's late. if you want, you can go ahead and delete, and i'll upload later when i have the info.Notanipokay (talk) 07:53, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

American politics discretionary sanctions notice
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:26, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Yea okay. Thanks for the warning, officer. I haven't edited anything on the Betsy Ross page and was explicit about my intention to not edit it, so you can unclench. Notanipokay (talk) 17:40, 5 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Yet the next day you did this: [].  Acroterion   (talk)   03:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * And it stood because it reflected the consensus that the vandalism by the brigade of the previous days didn't merit inclusion. Notanipokay (talk) 21:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Might Is Right, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:18, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * I raised this with you on your talk page. We'll address it there. I wasn't surprised to see there are others you've flown off the handle at recently. Notanipokay (talk) 21:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC)