User talk:Notassimpleasitseems

Hi. I tried to contest the deletion of my page--jibbajabbasniggawongadingdong--because I don't believe that it's vandalism. I truly don't. It's hard to describe why, but I really, really don't. Anyway, I tried to contest the deletion, and I wasn't able to, so I'll do what I can here.

For me, the word "jibbajabbasniggawongadingdong" is something that I'm going to remember for the rest of my life, simply because of this night. It doesn't have a definition as of this point, but there may be a time when it does--will it THEN be qualified for Wikipedia (or Wiktionary)? I realize that Wikipedia is a respectable encyclopedia that provides the best in content for its users, and I was not trying to degrade their experience in any way. I assure you.

Please allow that simple little page to be created. It's more of a project than anything, but I believe that it is, and could be even more, important.
 * Bullshit. We know better. Be thankful you're not being denied talk-page for this bogus explanation. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 05:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I swear to God. On my mother's grave. For what I thought was a respectable institution, you're not treating me very well.

I do understand that that page wouldn't have been the gem of Wikipedia. However, I myself would moderate it to make sure that it wouldn't be offensive. It would be a harmless, even humorous little corner of Wikipedia on a word that makes no sense. There's probably a page for Jabberwocky. Notassimpleasitseems (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

(And then there's this little piece of heaven: Lopado­temacho­selacho­galeo­kranio­leipsano­drim­hypo­trimmato­silphio­parao­melito­kat akechy­meno­kichl­epi­kossypho­phatto­perister­alektryon­opte­kephallio­kigklo­peleio­la goio­siraio­baphe­tragano­pterygon. I wasn't even allowed to link back into the wiki for that; it said it was invalid.) Notassimpleasitseems (talk) 05:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * That's because we saw the thread, dummy. Stop lying to us. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 06:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I never said it wasn't from a raid thread. I was actually going to include that in the article itself. It would bring up the topic of raids, etc. It's not like I thought you guys were stupid enough to not immediately go look at 4chan and be like, "Oh, well THAR'S your problem." I just don't think that's enough of an excuse. Why should it matter where that specific word was created? I mean, seriously. I saw that word, and I was enamored of it; I did what I could to make something of it. Yeah, I know that people from /b/ aren't usually the respectable type, but I really, really mean everything I've said on this talk page, and if you actually read it and take it for what it says, it doesn't contradict itself. I'm not lying, I'm not attempting in any way to deceive you. I would have monitored the page and made sure that nothing there was offensive. I personally would take responsibility for the content of that page, as I do for most of the content of this one. If there's anything you're going to learn about me, it's that I'm an honest person, and generally respectable. (And yes, I do intend to stay around; if my block is ever lifted, I plan on being constructive and helpful. [Although, I must say, I had an old account a while ago, and I quit because all of my edits were reversed--I only edited spelling, grammar, etc., but I would come back to the page to check it a few minutes later, and my edits would be gone. I quickly became discouraged and stopped trying.]) (sorry I forgot the sig.) Notassimpleasitseems (talk) 06:27, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but given the nature of /b/ practically every article named in a raid thread is protected on sight and all unknown editors/IPs there are blocked if they edit those pages. I cannot trust you whatsoever since your first edit was solely to create the article with "4chan" only and your edits since then have been trying to justify participating in a raid thread. WP:SOCK states that any user editing in a pattern similar to known other blocked users are to be treated as that user and blocked as same. Because of how many socks like you're we've blocked from 4chan, I heavily doubt any administrator will unblock. You are welcome to try, however: type under this discussion and an admin will be by to assess it. Just remember - admins can see deleted revisions, and thus you're not apt to be unblocked. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 06:30, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

... Oh. Completely understandable.

And I'm sorry if I've seemed disrespectful.

... Gah. I don't even know if I should ask this or not, but if I can find my old account and start attempting to do (solely constructive, thou shalt not worry) edits again... how likely is that to be seen as sock puppetry? I pinky finger swear to God on my mother's grave that I will eat shards of glass if I ever vandalize Wikipedia. It will never happen. However, I want to be able to edit again, and I don't want to be blocked if I log in from this IP, as this is my home. Notassimpleasitseems (talk) 06:44, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Connecting the accounts on your talk page would work, and it would be a mitigating circumstance if the old account is not blocked. Alternatively, you could declare this as your "fresh start" account and request an unblock here, abandoning the old one. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 06:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I think I'm going to try the second route... I like this username.

Thanks for reading and considering. Notassimpleasitseems (talk) 07:11, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

(I put my reason within chevrons/angle brackets... If I shouldn't have, just let it be known that there IS a reason there, and it's on the edit page, since I see that it's not showing up on the talk page itself...) Notassimpleasitseems (talk) 07:15, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I removed the chevrons, to avoid any chances of misunderstanding. Notassimpleasitseems (talk) 07:15, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Now all you need to do is wait for an administrator to review. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 07:48, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I must say, the waiting game is my least favorite game ever. But so life goes. Notassimpleasitseems (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I said nothing of reality. I have apologized. I understand your decline; however, I do believe you could have declined in a more polite manner. I'm a knowledgeable, intelligent person who did something that I will, at this point--admittedly out of the "heat of the moment"--freely admit was misplaced. I swear that I meant no offense, and that I do still believe that something good could have possibly come of that; however, I understand that this was the wrong place to do it. I made a mistake. I'm trying to deal with the consequences in a civil manner, the least you could do is the same.

Notassimpleasitseems (talk) 09:46, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Notassimpleasitseems (talk) 10:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Oh, how I love narrow world views... I'm not "a disruptive person from 4chan". I'm a person who was on 4chan, saw a thread, made a bad decision, and is now trying to rectify his mistake. I don't even understand why it was so disruptive, honestly. It was a page nobody was ever going to see. I understand why it doesn't belong o Wikipedia, and I understand the deletion, but a full-on block is just ridiculous. Oh, and by the way... I got an 800 on the critical reading section of the SAT, and my IQ is 142. So... yeah. Just sayin'. Notassimpleasitseems (talk) 18:32, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * You could also try contacting unblock-en-l[at]wikimedia.org to request unblock, or go to #wikipedia-en-unblock on freenode via IRC, or contact the Ban Appeals Subcommittee at arbcom-en-l[at]wikimedia.org if the former two routes fail. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 18:40, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Well thank you :) I may try those, though it may not be worth the fight. Notassimpleasitseems (talk) 20:46, 5 June 2011 (UTC)