User talk:Notavulgarusername

June 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to GG Allin has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: GG Allin was changed by Notavulgarusername (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.895159 on 2014-06-30T08:44:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.39.152.45 (talk) 07:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

clearly this is most likely your sock puppet page huh.
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.39.152.45 (talk) 07:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Fool
Why are you not willing to debate that fact at Hardcore Punk. Motorhead at a Minimum is NWOBHM. WHERE DO YOU THINK THE "HEAVY" CAME FROM. Thin air. HARD ROCK and EARLY METAL Combined with Punk Rock is Hardcore. Not totally in 1979 but from 1982 With Battalion Of Saints at a Minimum Up Til NOW. So all of a sudden that page shows up no other editing more or less except HC. Did either of you even have a career in HC. Do you think you "own" the page. Is That Your Sock Puppet. Its going to be investigated. Glad you got involved. Duh. What does this mean to You.... "it took the previous punk sound and added the incessant, heavy drumbeats and distorted guitar sound of New Wave of British Heavy Metal bands, especially Motörhead.[69]" That is On the actual page. So basically you don't care if its wrong. hardcore didn't just happen" out of thin air. Its a HYBRID. 68.39.152.45 (talk) 10:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.39.152.45 (talk)

Edit warring over hardcore punk
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 11:51, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪  ߷  ♀ 投稿 ♀  02:38, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Hardcore punk. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 05:24, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nash Grier has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nash Grier was changed by Notavulgarusername (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929186 on 2014-08-11T07:38:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Bongwarrior (talk) 07:54, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hi, I see that you have removed some contents out of the article Death Grips without stating the reason why, so I'm reverting it back. Please state a reason if you are to remove content the next time. Thanks.-TerryAlex (talk) 12:52, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Please do not remove sourced content without any sort of discussion or rationale. Failing to do so may get you blocked again, so please stop. Thanks. Sergecross73  msg me  23:09, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, I'm MyNameIsVlad. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Fine Brothers— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MyNameIsVlad💬 20:52, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Fashion Week (album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 21:08, 15 March 2015 (UTC)