User talk:Nothing Worth Preserving

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 22:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

October 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Refuse Fascism has been reverted. Your edit here to Refuse Fascism was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/NoBullShitMedia/videos/894491187383768/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Refuse Fascism
Hi! Welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Arms & Hearts and I've been working on the Refuse Fascism article (and this isn't an automated comment). I appreciate the effort you've put into improving that article, but I'm afraid I've had to undo your changes. (As you probably know, this doesn't mean that the content you added is lost forever, just that it's not in the current draft of the article, pending discussion.) There are basically three points at stake here: (Also, it's a minor thing, but we never use external links in prose. They only ever go in the external links section in the appendices and in the infobox at the top right.) Again, thanks for your work, and I hope we can work together on the article in future. If you have any questions you can let me know here or at my talk page. – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 23:19, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia strongly discourages people from editing on topics around which they have a conflict of interest. This means that if you're involved with Refuse Fascism in any capacity, you should feel free to suggest changes at Talk:Refuse Fascism, but should avoid directly editing the article yourself. This is because Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a vehicle for political organisations (or any other entities) to advertise themselves. If you're not personally involved with Refuse Fascism then you can of course ignore this point, but if you are it would be good if you'd let us know, in the spirit of working collectively and collegially.
 * Wikipedia articles are written from a neutral point of view. This means that we don't take a stance for or against the topics we write about. This also means that articles tend to be written in quite a dry, noncommittal style. Sentences like "Refuse Fascism is a mass organization in the United States with one single unifying objective: to drive out the Trump-Pence regime", which would be a perfectly good sentence if one was trying to propagandise for the group, are not appropriate for a Wikipedia article. Likewise a sentence like "They draw inspiration from the actions of people in Tahrir Square in Egypt in 2011, and of South Korea in 2016, both of which forced regime change through determined, sustained, non-violent protest of millions who refused to leave until their demands were met" – words like "determined" can be read as a positive assessment of the topic, which is the kind of thing we try to avoid.
 * Wikipedia articles are written on the basis of verifiability rather than truth per se. This means that every statement we make in an article must be referenced to a reliable source (in contemporary political topics, this usually means a mainstream media source). This is especially important when it comes to claims about living people. While you may think that the article prior to your edits contained inaccuracies, every claim was attributed to a reliable source, whereas you added unreferenced and potentially controversial claims (e.g. the one quoted above about the road blockade).