User talk:Nothingbutthegirls

February 2008
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Zephyrad (talk) 14:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to The Cake. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Scarian Call me Pat 14:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your submission has been reviewed and has been put on hold pending clarification or improvements from you or other editors. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia&. If there is no response within twenty-four hours the request may be declined; if this happens feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you.  Chzz  ► 05:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Moved comment
Hi Nothingbutthegirls! Welcome to Wikipedia! I moved a comment you added here to Talk:Hong Tianguifu. jonkerz ♠talk 14:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Basket Feudalist 17:40, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Abigail MacBride Allen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! hmssolent \Let's convene My patrols 04:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Abigail Adams Macbride concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Abigail Adams Macbride, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:39, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Abigail Adams Macbride


Hello Nothingbutthegirls. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Abigail Adams Macbride.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:15, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Survey Invite
I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics. Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=1R1zIzg92FHco4d_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_02IEFgvnA7OFXpz&Q_CHL=gl I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations. Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 16:57, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

March 2020
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Eugenics. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 03:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

It was not opinion. The previous subtitle was very long and more a descriptive paragraph than a subtitle. It was also more opinion-oriented than the new neutral subtitle I wrote. Chuck Mall 14:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Abigail MacBride Allen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abigail MacBride Allen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Abigail MacBride Allen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:48, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Sad that you guys chose to delete a well-researched article about a person connected to a famous writer—Laura Ingalls Wilder—due to outside pressure from the subject. If we are going to cater to every living person who wants a hagiography or else, you will not have a reliable resource. It will be akin to Buzzfeed.

Sad that you guys chose to delete a well-researched article about a person connected to a famous writer—Laura Ingalls Wilder—due to outside pressure from the subject. If we are going to cater to every living person who wants a hagiography or else, you will not have a reliable resource. It will be akin to Buzzfeed.

Short Desc on Redirect Pages
Hi! I'm. I noticed that on the page, you added a shortdescription. While you are allowed to add these to redirect pages, I wanted to remind you that they should be placed UNDER the first line of the redirect like such:
 * 1) REDIRECT Target

You can see how putting the description above breaks the redirect in this Diff.Please see Short description if you have any more questions. Happy Editing-- IAm Chaos  08:29, 27 April 2022 (UTC)