User talk:Nothingofinterest

Speedy deletion nomination of Sugar coated fury


A tag has been placed on Sugar coated fury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. BarkingFish 19:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)


 * It's called Candy Coated Fury and there is already an article about it. JohnCD (talk) 19:41, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Weezer. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ''You made a lot of harmful edits to Weezer. One edit was about Weezer not being emo. If the content was sourced, then what more do you need. Please refrain from these types of edits. Thanks.'' Lighthead  þ 03:05, 9 September 2012 (UTC)