User talk:Noto-Ichinose

Disambiguation link notification for August 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Defense Distributed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Defense_Distributed check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Defense_Distributed?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Edit-warring on Gateway Pundit
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 21:31, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I was just coming here to issue the same warning. You have made the same edit three times now. If you make it a fourth time you are likely to get a block for edit warring. Work out your content dispute on the talk page. --MelanieN (talk) 22:50, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

More problems
On Gateway Pundit, besides the edit warring (and besides the ridiculous "news publication"), you inserted obviously non-neutral information, with BLP implications. On Doxing, you inserted blatantly false information about "Antifa"; first of all, there is no "Antifa" in the sense of an individual organization, and second, as the linked article clearly explained, the one person who runs that website "is" not Antifa. On DEFCAD, you inserted yet more editorial commentary, with another BLP violation. It seems you're here to be an activist of some sort, and I hope you will prove me wrong. But just in case--though you seem to be well aware of the technicalities of editing Wikipedia, I will drop a few templates below that indicate what the community's recourse is against problematic editing in problematic areas. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 14:55, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Hello, I'm Abequinn14. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Racism— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. Abequinn14 (talk) 13:59, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Nzd has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Using an edit-warring template after a single revert is an abuse of the template. Please don't do that again.'' Nzd   (talk)  14:02, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring
Under normal circumstances, edit warring notices should be issued if the user reverted edits more than three times within 24 hours with exceptions of WP:1RR, WP:0RR (Arbitration enforcement) and clear-cut cases of vandalism. only reverted your edits once which didn't violate the 3 revert rule. Please review WP:3RR. I have removed the notice you issued. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus  (talk to me) 14:17, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

WP:ANI
When you start a discussion with a user, you must notify them on their talk page by using the template. Regards ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus  (talk to me) 14:37, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring
It looks like Abelmoschus Esculentus already told you about giving edit warring warnings for no good reason, you might do well to read it. Why did you revert my null edit? It seems like you're just trying to be disruptive at that point. GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:29, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kakumei-teki himote doumei


A tag has been placed on Kakumei-teki himote doumei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:33, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 16:38, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Your block is for edit warring, POV editing, placing unwarranted warnings, and seeking retribution on another editor via ANI. I urge other administrators to see if a serious topic ban via DS is in order. Drmies (talk) 16:39, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

AfD's???
You just listed a bunch of biography pages up for AFD. Why? Abequinn14 (talk) 19:31, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Noto-Ichinose. Thank you. —GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:44, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 00:28, 11 August 2018 (UTC)