User talk:NotsraM/Archive Jan 2007

Hi there; Yes, I have looked, but I cannot find any article. It has been deleted. I would be happy to comment on it, but it is no longer there. I make no comment on the article itself, which I have not seen, but do you think that there is any point in arguing, if Wiki policy favours deletion? All that tends to happen in my experience in this type of situation is that the editor (you) gets blocked, which helps nobody. Just a friendly thought - as I say, I have not seen the article.--Anthony.bradbury 23:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Sometimes you just cut your losses and go somewhere else. An afterthought.--Anthony.bradbury 23:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Will pursuing this further really get me blocked? - NotsraM 23:47, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Please read Criteria for speedy deletion (especially Articles, 1 and 7) and Notability (web). Pursuing this would get you blocked only if you recreate the page repeatedly without making it meet the standards described on those pages. —Cuivi é nen 01:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

FriHost
I did the best I could, my friend. I placed the article in Articles for Deletion - that would allow some minimum amount of time for you to add information. If you are still interested in pursuing it, I suggest you read WP:WEB to determine if the topic meets Wikipedia's criteria (it needs to meet only one of them to be considered notable enough) and then find out as much as you can about FriHost. I would advise against trying to recreate it right away - you'll only get yourself blocked. Give it a week or two and try again. Let me know if and when you have something you think is ready, and I will give you a fair hearing. Denni  talk 02:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your help regarding the FriHost article, everyone :-) - NotsraM 02:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I'd like to suggest that we work on a FriHost article in userspace, for example at User:TerrorBite/FriHost. The page won't get deleted, being in userspace. Then we get it checked by experienced Wikipedians. People can leave comments for improvement on User_talk:TerrorBite/Frihost.
 * Once the article is gets to the point where it is large enough, and it has been 'approved' by experienced Wikipedians, then it can be moved to the main wikispace.
 * --TerrorBite 09:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me. - N&#246;&#134;&#36;&#174;&#229;M 02:05, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Warning: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Disinclination 01:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Gotta' admit, it was pretty funny though. - NotsraM 01:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * :P Disinclination 01:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Best friends forever? - NotsraM 01:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edits to Talk:Elisha Cuthbert
Please don't add nonsense to talk pages. Talk pages are for discussing the article not for chatting or other inappropriate behavior. —B33R  Talk • Contribs 03:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry. - N&#246;&#134;&#36;&#174;&#229;M 04:00, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to Old Tunes
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, NotsraM! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, and try to reinsert the link again. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 22:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm in ur bed sexn ur gurlfriend. Kthxbai. - N&#246;&#134;&#36;&#174;&#229;M 22:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Shadowbot would appear to be an automated bot. Do bots even have girlfriends? --TerrorBite 09:29, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * AntiVandalBot? - N&#246;&#134;&#36;&#174;&#229;M 22:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

This is a test.
To see if this section will be archived properly. - N&#246;&#134;&#36;&#174;&#229;M 00:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)