User talk:Notta skeptic

Unspecified source for Image:OSE Logo Web.GIF
Thanks for uploading Image:OSE Logo Web.GIF. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; The Sunshine  Man 20:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:HS covers lined up.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:HS covers lined up copy.jpg. The copy called Image:HS covers lined up copy.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 20:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I gave more detail
on the Cyclops page you said the timeline was wrong. So I edit what i put in. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkSleach (talk • contribs) 17:20, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Office of Science Education


The article Office of Science Education has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "If anything, this should be merged in as a section within the NIH article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~RAM (talk) 06:18, 10 December 2020 (UTC)