User talk:Nova Playz100

List of retired Atlantic hurricane names
Hi there, Thanks for contributing to the List of retired Atlantic hurricane names by tweaking the death and damage totals for various systems. However, I have had to RV them as you have not provided a source for your changes that is external to Wikipedia which is crucial for verifying that the deaths/damages are correct.Jason Rees (talk) 12:51, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Non-tropical origin
Hey there! Just wanted to give you a heads up on a few recent edits you made at Hurricane Michael (edit) and Hurricane Joaquin (edit) that I recently reverted. Per Hurricane Michael's tropical cyclone report, Michael had a complex origin but is described as coming from "a large area of disturbed weather... over the central and western Caribbean Sea" with some interaction with "a tropical wave moving into the region". This occurred at tropical latitudes and from generally tropical processes (no mention of anything overtly non-tropical in the report, or hinting at a front, upper-level low, or any of the usual non-tropical suspects in the storm's origin). On the other hand, Hurricane Joaquin's official report makes it explicit that Joaquin was the strongest Atlantic non-tropical storm on record, which makes that a verifiable claim. Perhaps the Central American Gyre has some non-tropical aspects, but we can't state this as fact unless we have multiple reputable sources making that assertion (also see Wikipedia's policy on original research).

Hope that clears up any confusion, -- TheAustinMan (Talk ⬩ Edits) 03:27, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

August 2020
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/IvanGamezz. Thank you. CycloneYoris talk! 01:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Your recent editing history at 2020 Atlantic hurricane season shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:41, 1 November 2020 (UTC)