User talk:Novak123

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! France 3470   ( talk ) 15:51, 19 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi Novak123. It looks like you may struggle to convince other editors of Barbara Grace Tucker's general notability.
 * But just a quick review of your sources:
 * Might be used as a general external link, but is not about Grace herself.
 * A useful source as it is BBC and has some direct quotes.
 * Looks like a bit of a blog/forum site, but could still be used, I think.
 * An excellent source that might even establish notability on its own, in my view.
 * A bit general - does not mention Tucker - but could be used to support background.
 * Another excellent source (see 4 above).
 * These are just my own personal view, of course. But if you gave your proposed article a sounder structure, you might be able to re-submit, I feel. Regards. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi
Was good to meet you today, and hopefully you had lots of food for thought to carry on editing with! Good luck with it all - follow the links about to work on redrafting your article before you re-submit it - I think with the sources you found you should be able to write it up enough to meet notability criteria :) Leela0808 (talk) 16:22, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey again - hope you're well! Merry Christmas and all :) I found | this link which I thought would be useful for the article on barbara you were working on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leela0808 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 19:37, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Barbara Grace Tucker
Greetings! Thanks for your contributions but please, improve the article by fixing styles and giving proper citation from the sources. Thanks, NickAang (talk) 14:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I wonder do you have any direct quotes from Tucker, which have been published in the press? I think these might help to fill out the article and illustrate the cause for which she has been protesting. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:37, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Barbara Grace Tucker concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Barbara Grace Tucker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Barbara Grace Tucker concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Barbara Grace Tucker, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Barbara Grace Tucker


Hello Novak123. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Barbara Grace Tucker".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Alexander Archdale.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Alexander Archdale.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:00, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Citation formatting
I saw that in this edit you added a citation to Mercia Deane-Johns. Thank you. But I also saw that the only information you provided was the url and the title. At the very least, you should provide the name of the website (which is usually not the same as its address, an error that many make), using work or website. Whenever possible, provide the author's first and last name, (first and last) and the publication date (date). For a web source, you should always give the accessdate parameter. This is the date you actually looked at the page and saw that it was in place and supported what it was cited for. This is important because if the site goes away or is changed, this is the date from which searches for an archived version can start.

Also, when you give a title, it should be the title of the page, not the title of the site. In this case it should be "Movie movements that defined cinema: the Australian New Wave", not "Empire online".

Giving proper citation data makes the citations much more useful for the reader. Please fill in the data on any further citations you add. Thank you. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 15:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Please note how I added bibliographic info to one of your recent citations in this edit. All the info was in the online cited source; it was just a mater of copying it in. Could you please add this detail when you add sources in future? DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:35, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

You have added four more citations, all of them with no info but URL and title. Is there anything That I can say or do to get you to provide additional information about the sources you cite? DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 00:57, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

I amended the citation of the film Molly in the Filmography to include the source to Oz Movies. Novak123Novak123 (talk) 19:09, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Please do not cite as sources the blogs of individual people, where there is no editorial control or oversight. See WP:RS. Such citations will be removed. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 18:13, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Never cite a Google search (or other online search), as the results may change without warning, and may indeed be different for different people at the same time, as Google modifies its search output depending on its information on the person doing the search. Instead, cite one or more of the reliable sources found by such a search, if any are. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 18:27, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

And please stop citing the IMDB! DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:35, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Babs and Brian in 2009.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Babs and Brian in 2009.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 01:45, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Mercia Deane-Johns.png
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:36, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Mercia Deane-Johns.png
Thanks for uploading File:Mercia Deane-Johns.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Novak123, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Mercia Deane-Johns have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:19, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mercia Deane-Johns.png


A tag has been placed on File:Mercia Deane-Johns.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Judy Davis in 1981&#39;s Winter of Our Dreams.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Judy Davis in 1981&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Mercia Deane-Johns in the TV series Vietnam.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mercia Deane-Johns in the TV series Vietnam.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.robertmcfarlanephotos.com/home.html; the stated license is not a compatible license. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

The license states "Images on this web site may be copied for research and study purposes" but content on Wikipedia is available for any use whatsoever, including commercial use. So the photo is not compataibly licensed. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

The image of Nicole Kidman and Mercia Deane-Johns is available in the National Library of Australia for public use and the photographer Robert McFarlane has given permission both to me and Mercia to use it. Robert is very elderly and has limited computer skills. I think the image is relevant to the entry. Novak123Novak123 (talk) 23:42, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Your addition to Mercia Deane-Johns has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:20, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diana McLean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boney ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Diana_McLean check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Diana_McLean?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Dear DPL bot, -that sounds funny doesn't it? I'm Novak123 - actually I have never heard of Dab solver. I certainly don't remember using it. Thanks for your interest. Novak123Novak123 (talk) 08:27, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Judy Davis in the 1981 film Winter of Our Dreams.jpg


The file File:Judy Davis in the 1981 film Winter of Our Dreams.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Decorative non-free use of a screenshot in Judy Davis which fails WP:NFCC and WP:NFCC. The reader doesn't need to see a non-free image to understand that Davis appeared in this film or even the role she played since that can be more that sufficiently understood text supported by citations to reliable sources. Even the comments that she portrayed a 'skinny street waif' can be more than sufficiently understand without seeing this particular screenshot. Non-free screenshots tend to only be allowed when they show some particular filming technique or aspect which can be used to support corresponding sourced critical commentary in the article so that the context for non-free use requireb by NFCC#8 is clearly provided. Non-free images are not used just for the sake of adding images or simply because some other article about actress may have more images in it. The images used in Nicole Kidman are freely licensed images so there use in articles is not subject to Wikipedia's non-free content use policy. If someone feels that one article has too many images, then that should be discussed on that article's talk page."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:49, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

I would request that the image be allowed to stand as there is only one image of Judy Davis in Wikimedia Commons. As a noted actress I feel her article merits more than one image. Novak123Novak123 (talk) 11:12, 4 September 2019 (UTC) Novak123 (talk) 11:12, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Judy Davis in the 1981 film Winter of Our Dreams.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Judy Davis in the 1981 film Winter of Our Dreams.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Minor edits
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Diane McLean, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:06, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

The name of the actress is Diana McLean. Novak123Novak123 (talk) 14:55, 23 October 2019 (UTC)