User talk:Novakart

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. Wikibofh(talk) 18:59, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

novakart
Thank you for your communication re. a link to the above, which Wikibofh has talked to you about. I agree with him it is not valid as a link. It does not contain sufficient extra material to offset the commercial nature of it. That is a judgement call. Thank you also for drawing attention to the site with the wrong artist: I have deleted this.

Wikipedia does not have a "main writer/contributor" for any sections. It is the free online encyclopedia which anyone can edit (as you've found out) and, for that matter, counter-edit (as you've also discovered). If you wish to contribute helpfully, you are welcome to add material to Jim Dine and Sam Francis. This would be much appreciated. It is recommended that such material is referenced, but if you're not sure how to do this, just put the reference in brackets or on the article talk ("discussion") page - there is a tab to click at the top. If you need any help let me know by leaving a message on my talk page (it's the quickest way to reach me). Tyrenius 23:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Jonathan Novak Contemporary Art
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jonathan Novak Contemporary Art, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.novakart.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)