User talk:Novelgazer

Your article has been moved to AfC space
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Novelgazer/The Rook (novel) has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Rook (novel), this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 05:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:08, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 The Rook (novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Tokyogirl79 (talk) 14:00, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Just for future reference, I wanted to mention that not all of the links listed were usable. Publisher pages generally never count as reliable sources since they only show that the book existed, which doesn't make it notable. Another link did not reference the book at all, so I had to remove it. The third link, the one that mentioned Grossman, that was good but is really more of a trivial source since it only briefly mentioned the book. In any case, I had previously declined it but managed to find some sources. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note on my talk page!Tokyogirl79 (talk) 14:00, 11 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79