User talk:Nowhere2Go

Neutral point of view
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Southern Baptist Convention. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. What you dismiss as "ancient" was within the lifetime of many living Southern Baptists and ex-Southern Baptists; and accusations of "heresy" have no place when you are removing sourced content from reliable sources. Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  20:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Southern Baptist Convention, you may be blocked from editing. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  23:30, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

I have attempted to address your concerns about balance in the lede; but you seem unable to understand that "credibly accused" is not the same as "convicted in a court of law", and any intelligent reader will understand that. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  21:09, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  23:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)