User talk:Noz4atu

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Fattyjwoods ( Push my button  ) 03:29, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Me and Bruce.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Me and Bruce.JPG. The copy called Image:Me and Bruce.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 03:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Removing Speedy Tags
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Fattyjwoods ( Push my button  ) 03:44, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Inside Insanity
The core requirement on Wikipedia is that the topic has actually received coverage in reliable sources, independent of the subject, by which we can verify that the content posted to the article is accurate (and continues to be as things change); in fact, if you read Wikipedia's notability policy, we explicitly define notability not as a factor of how big or small the topic is, but as a factor of "verifiability in reliable sources". A local radio show can still be notable if proper sources are present, and a national one can still be non-notable if proper sources are absent.

What that means, in other words, is that an article has to cite real sources, such as newspaper or magazine coverage, and an article which does not cite any sources (or whose sole source is the web page of the station that airs the show) is not entitled to be kept. And furthermore, our articles have to be written in a neutral point of view, not in a promotional "come check out our show!" sort of tone. (And while I can't strictly tell from your comments whether you're personally involved in the show or just a fan, I'd strongly suggest that you read our conflict of interest policy as well; it's at the very least pretty clear that your primary interest here was in promoting the show rather than in contributing to Wikipedia for the sake of Wikipedia.)

A new article can always be created about the show at a later date if real, reliable sources can be provided to demonstrate that the show has received media coverage — deletion on here is not a comment on the value or worth of the topic, but on the quality of the article as written — but if quality sources aren't present, then a show is not necessarily entitled to keep an article on Wikipedia just because it exists. The difference between Howard Stern or Dr. Demento and Inside Insanity, for our purposes here, isn't that they're produced by big companies and Inside Insanity is produced by a small one; it's that their articles cite real sources and yours didn't.

As well, our processes here don't require that an article's original creator receive a personal e-mail notifying them of a potential deletion. We're an encyclopedia, not a social networking site; once the article has been posted, it belongs to Wikipedia as a community, not to you personally. If contributing to Wikipedia for Wikipedia's sake isn't something that particularly interests you, that's fine — it's not everybody's thing — but we're not obliged to make special personal contact with you if you're not around here often enough to monitor these things for yourself. Bearcat (talk) 17:01, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Me and Bruce2.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Me and Bruce2.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 22:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Me and Bruce.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Me and Bruce.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 22:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)