User talk:Nozyeveryday

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christina Marie Harris (BeautyChickee) (March 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Christina Marie Harris (BeautyChickee) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Christina Marie Harris (BeautyChickee), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and save.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Christina_Marie_Harris_(BeautyChickee) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:David.moreno72&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Christina_Marie_Harris_(BeautyChickee) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David. moreno 72   01:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com as a source
Hi Nozyeveryday. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153). I believe idolwiki.com and whatnetworth.com are similarly unreliable. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 03:37, 19 March 2018 (UTC)