User talk:Npollmeyer/sandbox

Peer Review for Npollmeyer
Peer Review

I am going to be creating a list of things that I think will help you with the article. Making a list is just easier for me, so I'm hoping it will.

I looked at the original article because I noticed that there wasn't a picture or anything in your sandbox link so I can kind of see what you are doing. I like how you are breaking up the sections, I think it will make it easier to read and to follow. I also like the commission section, when I met with Rachel she said it was a good idea to have that information on hand if it was available because it changes the way we look at the plantings and it gives background information on why it was created. I also think you are doing a good job of keeping the content-neutral. -add links in the article, for example, Baroque Art -add where you are getting the information -go into more detail in some of the sections -maybe add a section on how people view this paint -for the composition section, I would see if there are any articles on it and maybe try to do a comparison between people who have different views on the painting

Overall, it is still early in the project but I think you have a good start. It looks like you have the right amount of words and everything if you are missing anything it probably isn't that much. You are definitely doing a better job than me, so keep up the good work!

Melissahumphreys (talk) 14:53, 3 April 2019 (UTC)melissahumphreys