User talk:Npsanchez/sandbox

Peer Review
Hello. I'm not sure if this is where I am supposed to post for peer review. This assignment is a little confusing. I saw you were assigned to War Profiteering so I randomly picked you to post my peer review on. I'm sorry if this is not the correct place. I will also be posting to your user page just to cover my bases.

-Lead/intro is clear, but it does not have citations backing the information. -Good variety and number of different types/examples. --However, some of the types/examples do not have citations backing the information. -In the sections of the United States and Pop Culture there are a variety of direct quotes. The sections would be stronger if the information was uniquely written. -The article would be more balanced if there was a section about other countries. Surely there is information on war profiteering, even long before the United States was a country. -Just as a suggestion, perhaps a section on historical War Profiteering and a section on current/modern War Profiteering. And both of those sections could be broken down into countries.

Partguypartshark (talk) 02:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)