User talk:Npslagle

Welcome!
Hello, Npslagle, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Roger Lee Berger, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Daiyusha (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Roger Lee Berger


The article Roger Lee Berger has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unremarkable. Having multiple publications is not how wikipedia measures remarkable. Any subject expert could shed light on how important those publications were."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Daiyusha (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Postpone deletion consideration
I'm in the process of completing the article with appropriate awards and more detail on his contributions to statistics. Though I'm unaware of a serious study of professor articles, I'd wager computer scientists receive disproportionate attention because of the technology making Wikipedia possible. Other quite remarkable faculty are left out, likely because of a mildly tautological emphasis on the very people who continue to improve the technology, ignoring other incredibly important academic disciplines, such as statistics.

I'd like a moratorium until I can improve the article. Despite the obvious accomplishments I noted, his textbook with Casella is standard in hundreds of curricular programs around the world.

Finally, I'm unclear on the comment about subject experts. Npslagle (talk) 05:57, 17 November 2018 (UTC)