User talk:Nrajah587

July 2021
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nepenthes rigidifolia, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The info is direct from McPherson Nrajah587 (talk) 02:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)


 * What publication is that? —C.Fred (talk) 02:48, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nepenthes mapuluensis, you may be blocked from editing. jp×g 03:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

This is not disruptive editing. The map image is completely wrong and has no basis in fact. I am not sure why the main photo disappeared, if you could fix that part it would be appreciated. Nrajah587 (talk) 03:34, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for repairing the main photo section, I will however have to edit it to correct the location to Batu Lawi which is correct. I hope you understand, thanks! Nrajah587 (talk) 03:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Nrajah587, you are invited to the Teahouse!
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Greg Bourke. PabloMartinez (talk) 20:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

IUCN status
Some recent edits you've made to Nepenthes species articles have either changed an IUCN status or added one, where not supported by IUCN references. Particularly in a Speciesbox, the IUCN status is based on and referenced to their assessment, even if the assessment is from years ago.

If there's no IUCN assessment/status for a species, don't add one in the Speciesbox, even when another source indicates they use IUCN criteria. If the IUCN assessment has been updated to something more recent than the Speciesbox reference, then by all means update that status and reference. But otherwise leave the status as is, even if it's old. Thanks, Declangi (talk) 21:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Blanking talk pages does not erase them from record. —VeryRarelyStable 01:44, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Declangi (talk) 00:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

I will admit the villosa growing on Everest was a hoax with a friend but I planned to revert it once he saw it. Same is true for Greg Bourke but soon afterwards realized it linked to the wrong Greg Bourke, the link being a rugby player not the botanist. Furthermore, there is such thing as getting a pre-copy of a book. Furthermore, tenuis’s location is not very well known unlike nebularum, hiding nebularum’s locality is of no purpose but hiding tenuis which is now critically endangered (since IUCN is always behind on these things) is. Thanks Nrajah587 (talk) 02:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)