User talk:Nramesh

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brodha V (July 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brodha V and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dr Strauss  talk  09:38, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brodha V (July 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RileyBugz was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brodha V and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録 21:45, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Response to question at Articles for Creation Help Desk
Hello again, Nramesh. Your response at the Help Desk is in the process of being moved to an archive, so I thought it better to respond here. As for getting someone to write the article for you, you can always ask (WT:WikiProject Hip hop might be a good place), but I doubt you'll get any offers. Most of us here have our own content to write and it is unlikely that anyone will take time away from their own efforts to work on yours. But I suppose it won't hurt to ask. Your draft does not seem to be blatantly promotional, but that's true only at first glance. Looking a bit deeper, I see promotional editing coming from your misuse of sources. I didn't look through the entire draft, so there might be more problems than the one that I'm about to describe. And this is the one in the introduction that names a few publications and then tells the reader that your client is "consistently listed ... on their Top 5 Indian rappers list". Not one of your sources actually does this. Indeed, at least one of them specifically limits itself to new, up-and-coming rappers. In a similar vein, although Rolling Stone India does indeed call him one of the "elite" (and that's a good quote to have in the introduction), your write-up suggests that all of the listed sources are saying this. And that simply isn't true. Again, I didn't look through all of the draft. But the existence of this kind of misuse of sources makes me uninclined to look any further. On a different note, most of the "Early life" section isn't sourced, especially considering that the PepsiMTV link is dead. Unsourced material in a biography of a living person is unacceptable and that material will need to be either sourced or removed. Finally, you've got far too many photographs for an article of this size. Frankly, the only one you need is the one in the infobox. This is not an article about someone who has lived so long that it makes sense to have photos from different stages of their life. Instead, you've got four photos that were all taken within a year or so of each other. They add nothing to an understanding of the subject and serve only to suggest that you have a promotional agenda. I hope this feedback is helpful. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. I'll keep this page on my watchlist, so I'll know if you respond here. NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:38, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Dear @NewYorkActuary thank you so much for giving me such insightful feedback. This was my first piece for wikipedia and your feedback was really helpful. I have edited it again keeping in mind all the points you and the other reviewers brought up. I have submitted it again for a review and I hope its better now! But I just wanted to tell you I really appreciate your help and comments. Thank you!

Best, Nramesh (talk) 14:55, 12 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brodha V has been accepted
 Brodha V, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録 22:14, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.