User talk:Nrdaniel/Cannabis in Louisiana

Peer review
Hi, I have uploaded some suggestions to your work. Here is what I think:

From what I read, there is only about six sentences under background information and four references at the bottom of the article. Therefore, I am assuming there is no lead to the article, so I will have to skip answering or reviewing anything for that section. Pertaining to content, the information is relevant and up to date. There are sources that back up the information provided and the sites work. The tone is neutral and balanced, so I got the impression that the paragraph was unbiased and factual. I did not see any media for the paragraph so the author may want to include that in the future of the article. It could also use more information that goes in depth on his subject of the topic since there were only a few sentences that scratched the surface of his work on the background section. Keep up the good work! Sophiabaylis (talk) 16:52, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hi, the article is very informative. Reliable sources were used. I also enjoyed the flow and content of the article. Great Job! (Queen0527 (talk) 22:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review Added Message
Hi, I have written an in depth peer review of your article in your sandbox but I'm just adding here that it overall done well and I collected a feeling that the tone is from a neutral standpoint. I enjoyed that the information was up to date for the topic and supplied reliable sources. Vrwebre (talk) 03:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Moved back to sandbox
Hi @Nrdaniel, Mdcoope2 Msanfor1, Rdekay, I moved this article back to the sandbox bc it is not suitable for mainspace. An article already exists for this topic, Cannabis in Louisiana.

Your contribution doesn't have to be in mainspace for your instructor to grade your work. I suggest you leave this in the sandbox. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:01, 19 May 2023 (UTC)