User talk:Nthai3313/sandbox

Article Evaluation
.The article is fully surrounded by information about poster with its history, purpose, development through times and its types. But based on my research about how a poster can impact and persuade one individual and groups, the history and development in the article is kind of distracting me and make me confused because it has too much information unrelated to my research. . The article is neutral and accurate, however, some sentences are still too "personally" and "unnecessary" such as "Today, posters are produced for most major films, and the collecting of movie posters has become a major hobby." . The article is a good source without any viewpoints that overrepresented or underrepresented. . There are 20 references in this article and the links are worked but some links are without the author name or the sources. For example, "The Soviet Union also produced a plethora of propaganda posters" . A few sources aren't reliable because it is without the author name or any evidence to prove the fact is right. For example, it is the source above. . All the sources are up to date which is in around 10 years up to now. . There is a question about "Fabric poster" by user Joeleoj123 but it is still without any answers. . The article is a part of three different projects: "WikiProject Graphic Design", "WikiProject Marketing and Advertising" and "WikiProject Visual Arts". It is all related to my research. . Wikipedia put the article in term of time and through its development. While in class, we discussed about its types first then go into its history and purpose. Nthai3313 (talk) 19:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)Nghi ThaiNthai3313 (talk) 19:29, 21 October 2017 (UTC)