User talk:Ntmy777/Solid-state chemistry/AnonymousIpad Peer Review

Response to Peer Review
Hi user AnonymousIpad,

Thank you for taking your time to review my article. I read your suggestions and made the following changes:

'you can improve your article by firstly, bringing back the history section. As I see in many Wikipedia articles on science subjects. Most of them contain a history section for the non-science reader to learn more about the background of that topic.'

I decided to dedicate most of my effort on sections that need major improvements (characterization), so I did not transfer the history section to my sandbox. However, the history section will not be removed from the original article!

Moreover, the current article seems to present ideas separately, maybe you can write a paragraph explaining why this section is needed in this article to improve the flow of reading.

You’re right about this! I added a sentence in the lead to briefly touch upon the important topics. I also did this under the characterization heading to make the sections flow better.

Other than these changes, I’ve also added new content on EDX, as well as coupling analytical techniques together like EDX analysis with SEM. Ntmy777 (talk) 05:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)