User talk:Ntorres32/sandbox

From Prof McClanan: You're off to a good start, and in particular share a lot of interesting information about the debate about the Christian versus pagan origins of your sarcophagus. The main challenge now is to revise what you have so that it's presented like a typical Wikipedia entry. In particular, look carefully at how entries are often organized with sub-categories and how sources are cited. I'm happy to meet with you this week and you can work on it w me if you are unsure of what you need to do. ALMc

Peer Review Rick Benson
Off to a good start. Mostly, I think you need to just work on adding the wikipedia features that an article needs. Sections and citations.
 * Concentrate on breaking your article up into sections. Learn how to insert headings. Wikipedia will pick up your headings and automatically create navigation for them at the top of your article.
 * Cite your sources from within your article. When you are in edit mode for the article, there is a button at the top that says: "CITE". Place your cursor where you citation should go and then fill out the citation by choosing the correct source (journal, file, etc). Wikipedia will automatically add your references to your article with the correct number related to your citation.
 * Check for grammatical and punctuation errors.

To break up your article you could have a section about Livia Primitiva. Tell us who she was and why she mattered. A section on the sarcophagus itself with things like: what does it look like, where does it exist, where was it found, who made it? Then maybe finish it up with a section on the controversy you outlined already.

Just some suggestions. Good luck!

Rkbjunior (talk) 06:19, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Feedback from Prof McClanan, 12/6
You've got the kernel here for a great entry, but the formatting isn't in line with Wikipedia standards. Touch base is you're unsure what to do, I'm happy to work with you more on this.

AMcClanan (talk) 02:37, 7 December 2018 (UTC)