User talk:Ntsepag

Hi,

I saw your lengthy addition to the Tibetan Canon article. If you are new to Wiki, you may not be aware that you need to provide in-line references to almost every statement of substance ~ otherwise some bureaucratic fanatic will delete or tag your contribution. Not me, but there are some around here .... I also suggest that you also think about breaking your addition up into much shorter segments with headings. And use some capital letters for proper nouns, for goodness sake ! Have a look at other long Buddhist related articles to see how these things are done. Good luck !

One other thing, most textual scholars do not think that there was actually an "old Narthang Canon" per se, just a vary large collection of texts with duplicates, which was then organized into something like the basis of the editions we have now-- अनाम गुमनाम  05:48, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Dear Anam Gumnam अनाम गुमनाम,

Thanks for your kind suggestion. Yes, I am new for this wiki and i have to learn all those stuff of reference line and format you suggested. I have my article written on this very subject published in Tibetan Journal 2005 which i wanted to be shared with wiki for public information. Regarding the "old Narthang Canon" in Tibetan sources it is clearly stated that new set of volumes of - bka’-’gyur & bstan-’gyur was re-inscripted (hand written) and placed at temple- jam-lha-khang of the snar thang monastery while it is not to be conform whether it is actually collection of book list itself as Catalogue or reprint of material itself. This is matter of purely a new research.