User talk:Nubbygarter

January 2014
Hello, I'm Jackmcbarn. I noticed that you recently removed all content from User talk:Aleksa Lukic, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:58, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to User:IronGargoyle has been reverted, as it removed all content from the page without explanation. Please do not do this, as it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:59, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to User:IronGargoyle. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

You have made very few useful edits, and were already blocked for vandalism once. And what "inappropriate content" did User:IronGargoyle and User talk:Aleksa Lukic contain? - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

My first block for vandalism was incorrectly performed. The image I placed on 'Niels Bohr' was apt and correct. The inappropriate content contained made a number of sexual, innapropriate references. Besides which, you have failed to complete the blocking process, with multiple warnings, and 1, 2, 3, 7 and 14 day blocks. Nubbygarter (talk) 19:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. --jpgordon:==( o ) 19:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

I am only removing the unblock review while I am blocked because it says the expiry time is indefinite. What else am I supposed to do? Nubbygarter (talk) 11:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Your repeated edit at Niels Bohr was, incidentally, also vandalism. If you seriously believe that it was apt and correct then this throws into question your ability ever to edit here. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)