User talk:Nubeli

Some stroopwafels for you!
My favourite! Nubeli (talk) 21:54, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Bikeunion-logo-green.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bikeunion-logo-green.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 17:08, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mainstreet Technologies


A tag has been placed on Mainstreet Technologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. C759 (talk) 13:25, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Backdrop CMS


A tag has been placed on Backdrop CMS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.

This article reads as an advertisement, cites sources from within the project and might be better suited as a subsection within the Drupal article.

A page you started (Bikeway safety) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Bikeway safety, Nubeli!

Wikipedia editor Hell walker guy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please add a category."

To reply, leave a comment on Hell walker guy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Merger discussion for Bixi (company)
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash; Bixi (company) &mdash;has been proposed for merging with PBSC Urban Solutions. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Mindfrieze (talk) 22:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Alexanderecohen/Mainstreet Technologies
User:Alexanderecohen/Mainstreet Technologies, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alexanderecohen/Mainstreet Technologies and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Alexanderecohen/Mainstreet Technologies during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Re: Deletion of Backdrop CMS
1. See User:Nubeli/Backdrop CMS

2. Its a moot point, it was deleted for having no credible assertion of notability, and that's not really something citations will help with. Its also a G11 eligible article since it reads as a cooperation promo piece, although that can be worked on with editing. Its your call for how to fix that. TomStar81 (Talk) 21:49, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Backdrop CMS for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Backdrop CMS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Backdrop CMS until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TomStar81 (Talk) 16:48, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cbn-logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Cbn-logo.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 07:13, 18 March 2023 (UTC)