User talk:Nubiatech

Talk
Page started. Nubiatech (talk) 00:19, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Hydramacin-1 DYK Nomination
Hi. I've nominated Hydramacin-1, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks, Shrumster (talk) 17:15, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

What shit?? in Sengoku Basara
WTF is the "known outside Japan as devil shit"??? In china it it the original title and also in a lot of places. Why you shitty Americans use that modified localized shit to replace all countries except Japan??


 * If you yourself had not changed it to say that it was known as devil shit, I may be a bit more sympathetic. J.delanoygabsadds 01:33, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

If you dont accept this, I can only conclude that you Americans think America can represent the entire human race. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.6.57.142 (talk) 01:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Who said the english wikipedia is only american?  §hawn poo   01:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

WHY??? he is FRENCH so it shud b a francofone title. pretty obvious. Tal-ġonna (talk) 04:44, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * ( even the orphans??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tal-ġonna (talk • contribs) 04:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Dave Hall (Ohio state representative)
Your tag of this article for speedy deletion was improper. Members of legislatures of first-order subdivisions of countries are notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree, my use of the "db-bio" tag was improper in this case. My intention was to point out the copyright violation, based on a precedent on Linda_Bolon article. I think Template:Db-copyvio would have been more appropriate, or may be still is. &prod;&cup;&beta;i&alpha;&tau;&epsilon;ch  18:25, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
I do apologize for it and I have no idea why huggle sent you a warning. Please disregard it, sorry. --Odie5533 (talk) 06:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Unitec New Zealand
Thanks, and good work on your part also. I used a diff with the last known good after seeing some residual nonsense on the page. XLerate (talk) 08:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Luis Gonzalez
Can you justify your seemingly arbitrary reversion? Thank you. 70.127.91.175 (talk) 01:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

70.127.91.175 (talk) 03:19, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Revert
Why would this edit be vandalism? 202.40.139.168 (talk) 06:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Care to respond? If not, I'll assume your revert to be based on personal disagreement, whereas I'll revert your edit for lack of rationale, and remove the warning you gave me. I also have the responsibility to report you to AN/I for the abuse of a counter-vandalism tool and giving out fraudulent warnings. 202.40.139.168 (talk) 06:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

WP:AN
You may be interested in this  Enigma msg  07:17, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

User talk:86.133.72.241
You accused this IP of vandalism, when it looked to me like an informal comment. Please do not bite the newbies. Totnesmartin (talk) 09:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This is the edit that was added to the top of the talk page:
 * "ite.. hw r u blaad? sik Init man, fags and wl innit man < chav speak is so stupid and immature, and thats coming from a 12 year old. why do people talk like that when it's so much easier to talk 'properly'.
 * I believe that constitues vandalism and warrants a warning as per vandalism, under the definition of:
 * Silly vandalism: Adding profanity, graffiti, random characters (gibberish), or other nonsense to pages
 * Userspace vandalism: Adding insults, profanity, etc. to user pages or user talk pages
 * Care to explain why are you accusing me of biting the newcomers?
 * p.s. I also replied on User_talk:86.133.72.241. &prod;&cup;&beta;i&alpha;&tau;&epsilon;ch 17:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Because you accused someone of vandalism when it may not have been? giving an example of chavspeak isn't "inserting nonsense or gibberish", it's being illustrative. Ok the whole post wasn't germane to the article (it fails WP:FORUM), but I think it was posted in good faith. Totnesmartin (talk) 13:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Can you assume good faith with the user's first edit for which they received a warning just 1 minute before I followed with a second warning? And the point here is not whether they are being "illustrative" or not; rather it is that they added gibberish to the top of the talk page. Do you think this user was replying to someone else' comment? Were they starting a new talk thread or section? They were being illustrative to whom? What was the point of this edit? Can you really describe this edit as "constructive"? Why do you think it was in good faith? Hypothetically speaking, do you think being illustrative while talking about highly charged articles such as racial/bigotry/sexual/adult/violence/genocide/nazi/hate is still just WP:FORUM material if they were slapped on top of talk page? Nu&beta;i&alpha;&tau;&epsilon;ch    Talk  10:59, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well I see Godwin's law has come into this thread, even though it was about colloquial English usage. Goodbye. Totnesmartin (talk) 14:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hi, just a quick note to say thank you for reverting the vandalism on my userpage :)    Badgernet    ₪    12:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

MedicLINK
I created the MedicLINK Systems Ltd page for my company at the time.

I am forced now to check the page hourly as someone is writing false facts about the company being pursued by Canada Revenue Agency and the Labour Board.

What can I do about this?

I just went ahead and deleted 90% of the content, but it appears you put it back in there.

What can I do, other than continuously check back on this page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mediclink (talk • contribs) 12:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I have locked the page from editing (protected) for a short period of time. I strongly suggest you attempt to discuss this with the other editors on the article talk page. All three (two registered users, one IP) have violated WP:EW and probably WP:3RR, and not one of you has tried to discuss the edits on the talk page. KillerChihuahua?!? 19:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stade de Khartoum
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Stade de Khartoum, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This page was just moved. I think I edited ALL the pages that linked here to point to the new page name.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Nu&beta;i&alpha;&tau;&epsilon;ch   Talk  12:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

From Fttxguru
I am marking citations to the links I need to connect them. Since I am not so familiar with this process I am making this in steps preventing mixup.

I wonder if you can help

Thx

Fttxguru (talk) 06:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Syed Ahmed Edits
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Syed_Ahmed_(entrepreneur)&action=edit&undoafter=285091261&undo=285094993

Happy to discuss this. Have raised with editor assistance and will go to dispute resolution if required.

I am an editor who has legitimate concerns about a biography of a living person, and Jimbo Wales' comments about such cases would appear to apply.

Amicaveritas (talk) 21:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

What do the numbers in mean? Next to the name where changes, etc. are made? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coreymullins (talk • contribs) 06:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Last warning
I'm on dialup. I'm not at all worried about a ban. I realize that I am vandalizing this page. It really is horse shit. These alternative therapies aren't. Did you review the source materials? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.156.234.125 (talk) 05:37, 4 May 2009 NOTE:The IP in question wrote this without signing.

Nubiatech please leave this section here. We might be able to use this as reason to block this IP. Thank you. --Sky Attacker (talk) 06:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

IP has been blocked. --Sky Attacker (talk) 06:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Mass reverts
Please be careful that your reverts of one editor do not inadvertantly revert the edits of another editor. Thanks much, Xenophrenic (talk) 21:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. Though the reference you added is already cited and restored in the very same sentence/paragraph after my edit. Nu&beta;i&alpha;&tau;&epsilon;ch    Talk  22:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, by me :) Xenophrenic (talk) 22:14, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Libyan Premier League 2008-09 - stop changing teams' names please
Hi, I am the creator of the Libyan Premier League 2008-09 page, and I'd just like to point out that the name of every team in the country begins with the prefix AL. Therefore, could you please stop editing the template, and the teams' names

I'd also like to say that I am Libyan, so I know what I'm talking about. I welcome any hints and tips or improvements, but the team names are fine as they are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by B.t.1994 (talk • contribs) 14:27, 23 May 2009


 * This is a misplaced notice; club names were changed by anonyms, I actually went ahead and rolled back most of the changes. Examples where I reverted the changes:


 * * Libyan Premier League 2008/2009
 * * Template:Libyan Premier League
 * * Al Wefaq Sabratah
 * Nu&beta;i&alpha;&tau;&epsilon;ch   Talk  16:23, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank You
Thank you for fixing the template that made the extraneous text around the picture disappear! I really appreciate it. Alishabird (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * ... and thank you for cleaning up my user-page - I didn't notice what that IP had done! JohnCD (talk) 17:45, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank You Very Much
Thanks for your barnstar recognition! Much appreciated. Kbrose (talk) 14:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

SRV edit
There is/was incorrect, and conflicting information in the article regarding SRV. Information is in conflict with the NTSB report, and the article is poorly written.Dfwaviator (talk) 00:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Big Jack Jackson.jpg
You can't rename images. If you made a mistake in the name, just db-author it and re-upload it with the right name. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help, much appreciated. For the record, I re-uploaded the picture to commons:File:Big Jack Johnson - Chicago Blues Festival 2009.jpg, and added it to Big Jack Johnson Big Jack Johnson - Chicago Blues Festival 2009.jpg  Nu&beta;i&alpha;&tau;&epsilon;ch  Talk/contrib 03:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Not a problem
We all have to stand together. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 17:10, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:File-Alistairdarling.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:File-Alistairdarling.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:00, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Not sure what this is about, probably a misplaced notice. I am not the creator of this file. I actually did nominate the file for deletion (here and here) because the file was a picture of some animal (no need to specify) and was only used to vandalize a page (this edit). The user who uploaded the file and vandalized the page was subsequently blocked.  Nu&beta;i&alpha;&tau;&epsilon;ch  Talk/contrib 11:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Huh. It must've gotten deleted just as you added the tag, thus creating a blank file that had only the FFD tag on it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:09, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiDefcon Question
I've spent ridiculous hours browsing this fine website yet I don't recall ever seeing Level 1 on that thing. Out of sheer morbid curiosity, just what sort of scenario(s) would Level 1 entail? :P - Warthog Demon  21:50, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I am not knowledgeable or experienced enough to answer that, but from skimming the template's talk page and its archive; it seems that level 1 would entail sustained vandalism by vandalbots, high RPM, considerable backlog at WP:AIV, require db lock, or combination thereof.  Nu&beta;i&alpha;&tau;&epsilon;ch  Talk/contrib 11:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Table Hiragana
Please discuss with us at Hiragana and ask people who could be interested as well. Thanks whatever your view is 79.192.239.79 (talk) 00:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Requests for comment/User page indexing
Please note Requests for comment/User page indexing has been repurposed from the standard RFC format it was using into a strraw poll format. Please re-visit the RFC to ensure that your previous endorsement(s) are represented in the various proposals and endorse accordingly.
 * Notice delivery by xenobot  14:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: VoIP article
Just a quick heads up, I reverted your edit here. I am assuming you made a mistake of some sort, and you may need to double check.  Nu&beta;i&alpha;&tau;&epsilon;ch  Talk/contrib 17:07, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I was using an external editor, and it looks like when I pasted the edited text back into Wikipedia, somehow two copies got pasted end-to-end. Thanks for catching it. I'll need to review the edits I made and see if I can reconstruct what I intended to do.&mdash;QuicksilverT @ 19:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Why being unfair with my updates?
Dear Nubiatech,

It seems you are doing good work on Wiki pages. Nevertheless why did you delete my updates on ASN.1?

I am working since few months with ASN.1 and I was looking for a great tool that can help me.

I have found much information on OSS and Obj-sys web pages but the tools that could solve my problem was found in marben web site. It takes me times to find it because not referenced on the wiki ASN.1 page. So I thought it could be easier and faster for people working on ASN.1 to have all the ASN.1 references on the same page.

So could you explain why not allowing marben tools as you allow OSS and Obj-sys even if they cannot solve all ASN.1 issue?

And what about K2C which is clearly shown as a commercial software? were is your objectivity? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ASN1-Updates (talk • contribs) 09:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I am waiting for an honest and fair explanation!

Best Regards.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by ASN1-Updates (talk • contribs) 09:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * First of all, welcome to Wikipedia! Secondly, I went ahead and removed most of the external links you mentioned above because -in my humble opinion- they do not conform to Wikipedia's guidelines: WP:EL, WP:LINKSPAM, WP:NOTHOWTO and WP:NOTLINK.
 * Please note that Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy; and per Ignore all rules: "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it."  Nu&beta;i&alpha;&tau;&epsilon;ch  Talk/contrib 12:57, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

WP:SRTA
I've replied to you there.

The Transhumanist 23:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Your comment...
... has a reply. FT2 (Talk 17:25, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Comodo Internet Security
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Comodo Internet Security. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Comodo Internet Security. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Research survey invitation
Greetings Nubiatech-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss

Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.

This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.

If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 18:29, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Contests
User:Dr. Blofeld has created WikiProject Africa/Contests. The idea is to run a series of contests/editathons focusing on each region of Africa. He has spoken to Wikimedia about it and $1000-1500 is possible for prize money. As someone who has previously expressed interest in African topics, would you be interested in contributing to one or assisting draw up core article/missing article lists? He says he's thinking of North Africa for an inaugural one in October. If interested please sign up in the participants section of the Contest page, thanks.♦ -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sudan Premier League 2009 teams map
Template:Sudan Premier League 2009 teams map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 13:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb competition 2009 CAFCC
Template:Fb competition 2009 CAFCC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 14:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb competition 2009 CAFCL
Template:Fb competition 2009 CAFCL has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 14:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sudan Premier League 2008–09
Template:Sudan Premier League 2008–09 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2019 (UTC)