User talk:NuclearWarfare/Archive 41

You've got mail!
Courcelles (talk) 01:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Block reason?
Hello! I think I was blocked by accident or mistake, since I don't edit anything, but I saw that before I request to be unblocked I'm supposed to ask and then understand why I was. It says that I was blocked for persistent vandalism, but I'm thinking there might be a mistake here since I haven't edited any pages that I can think of pretty much ever. Can you let me know what I'm meant to have done? Thanks very much--I appreciate it! --C 2/13/16 4:34pm 96.242.58.82 (talk) 21:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi! The block happened about six years ago actually; the person who used to use your IP address has likely changed and you now have it. I've gone ahead and removed the block notice from your page. Please don't worry about it! NW ( Talk ) 22:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Ah! Got it. Thanks so much! Best, C.96.242.58.82 (talk) 00:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Topic ban appeal
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding Arbitration enforcement action appeal. The thread is "[[Administrators' noticeboard#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Realskeptic|Arbitration enforcement action appeal by Realskeptic]]". Thank you. --Realskeptic (talk) 05:11, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Creating an article 'Josh Reaume' that was previously deleted by you
Hello There,

Wanted to inform you that I will be working on starting the article 'Josh Reaume' again. It was previously deleted in 2009 for a lack of sources. This will no longer be an issue.

Please let me know if you have any advice or comments regarding this.

Thanks!
 * I would reread the Notability (sports) and Identifying reliable sources pages carefully. If you're satisfied that he meets the minimum requirements, go ahead and create the article. NW ( Talk ) 10:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Discussion at WP:AN
Why did you suddenly close this discussion ? It was not finished and I didn't even and I didn't even finish answering the new editors involved in this discussion. Synthwave.94 (talk) 23:25, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Also note that unlike what I have seen on this page, I deserve to use AWB again. The issue was discussed twice following the disagreement. Synthwave.94 (talk) 23:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The discussion was open for several days and then closed, as is standard practice. Several administrators argued for removing access. I would suggest waiting several months and reapplying after demonstrating a history of editing collegially. NW ( Talk ) 23:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * NuclearWarfare, I've been using AWB for more than one year without receiving any negative comments about my changes. What I did by changing  into   is not controversial at all and I don't see why I should wait several months to use it again if it was clearly proved there was no abuse of this tool. Synthwave.94 (talk) 16:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Also your statement is incorrect : only one admin doesn't want to see me using AWB again : Floquenbeam. Hasteur and Mendaliv, who answered the post, are NOT admins. Synthwave.94 (talk) 16:29, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The only other admin involved in the discussion, Rich Farmbrough, explicitly said : "In the event that we agree that there was good reason to believe that these edits would not have been controversial, then that is no reason to prevent Synthwave from using AWB." It proves there's no reason to prevent me using a tool I use perfectly well, especially as two discussions (at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style and Talk:Money (That's What I Want)), WP:OVERLINK and WP:SEAOFBLUE all prove that I was properly using AWB. Synthwave.94 (talk) 16:45, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * If my edits performed with AWB were actually incorrect, I would have been reverted by other editors and would have received negative comments. But it was not the case; nobody reverted me, nobody said it was incorrect to make these changes with AWB. I'm therefore asking to get access to AWB again for all this stupid "controversy" surrounding my actions. Synthwave.94 (talk) 16:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you please tell me what I'm supposed to do regarding what I previously said on your talk page ? Synthwave.94 (talk) 01:29, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lost Years of Merlin.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Lost Years of Merlin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 10 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Boston Marathon bombing page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=724643716 your edit] caused an unsupported parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F724643716%7CBoston Marathon bombing%5D%5D Ask for help])

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover nature.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Cover nature.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gnom (talk) 09:09, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Typo
FYI...it appears ArbCom topic banned Sashi until...six months ago. Probably a typo that could use fixing. Cheers. Timothy Joseph Wood 23:32, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Where do you mean? NW ( Talk ) 02:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Fixed, thanks. NW ( Talk ) 03:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

It appears that Nuclear Warfare, acting against the opinion of other administrators, who spoke at most of a warning, banned the peaceful SashiRolls from the topic Jill Stein. SashiRolls (talk) 04:01, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes. NW ( Talk ) 05:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Request for information
OK. I would like to formulate an appeal, and I would like to know the grounds of the decision, and whether ArbCom was involved. I will cite the grounds in my appeal. Thanks for your help. SashiRolls (talk) 14:44, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Appeal to 6 month topic ban
Having had no response to my request for information concerning the 6-month topic ban that you applied to me against the opinion of the two other administrators who weighed in on the original case, I have decided to formally appeal your decision. I will add a link once the appeal is filed. Thank you for your attention to this matter. SashiRolls (talk) 01:27, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Here is a direct link for your convenience. Again, I thank you for your time.  SashiRolls (talk) 02:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)


 * I see that you have filed your request. The grounds of my decision were based on my statement in the original arbitration enforcement request. The Arbitration Committee was not involved. NW ( Talk ) 12:47, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Category:Billy Bush has been nominated for discussion
Category:Billy Bush, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:43, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins) .MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Topic ban and copyvio
Leaving a message here in the interest of transparency, and to avoid any possible future content disputes that may attempt to masquerade as topic ban enforcement.

user:SashiRolls violated their topic ban from Jill Stein, instituted by yourself on behalf of ArbCom, but did so to bring attention to a fairly blatant WP:COPYVIO which has since been addressed. For what it's worth, I think this was a good catch, and should not be counted against the user. Timothy Joseph Wood 12:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for fixing the copyright violation introduced by Snooganssnoogans (who oddly has still (!?) never been topic banned despite all the evidence during that case and since), Timothyjosephwood.SashiRolls (talk) 14:13, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for letting me know Timothyjosephwood. I agree with your assessment and do not feel the need to proceed further. NW ( Talk ) 21:22, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your not disciplining me (again) for working to defend Wikipedia from POV editing, this time by pointing out a clear copyright violation from the same person. Your decision not to use DS to prevent further misbehavior from the copyright violator is less comprehensible to me.  Further evidence that the user just doesn't get it here.  This flouting of Wikipedia principles (including WP:5P1, WP:5P2, WP:5P3 & WP:5P4) should stop. SashiRolls (talk) 06:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)


 * NW, after all these years your talk page has remained on my watch list, not that I ever check it but I have a terrible streak of sentimentality that sometimes forces me to do things that don't make a lot of sense. Through these ten years here I have clung to you (and MastCell) as the Wikipedia ideal that I look up to and admire.  But a few days ago your page connected to the Jill Stein article came up and just a few days prior I had read her article -- and was sorta horrified to find such a biased WP article.  I made a few attempts to edit; my attempts were quickly reverted and, aware as I am about WP's stance on GMs and altmed, I knew better than to continue.  That you have read her article and were not be concerned about the bias surprises me.  OK, I could go on but after all these years I have learned to not waste my breath.  Gandydancer (talk) 20:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Question about user you previously sanctioned
After you sanctioned a user on a similar topic -- this edit  appears to directly violate WP:SYNTH (sources don't mention the topic of the article itself at all). And edit-wars to add it back in, again, at. After comments from, user unfortunately seems refusing to get it. Keeping in mind the prior sanction you gave the user on that related topic -- would some further action be appropriate here from an admin? Sagecandor (talk) 19:37, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi
You're not much for fact, logic and reason, are you. So shut you're mouth not just 99% but 100% of the time. If you have no good explanation for what you say, stop talking altogether. I expect to never hear another word from you again. You've had a million years to explain yourself. Since there has been less than zero fact, logic and reason from you up to now, stop communicating with me from now on.Jimmuldrow (talk) 05:58, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lost Years of Merlin.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Lost Years of Merlin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Hamish Ross
Hello, I noticed Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Hamish Ross as the #1 result in Special:WantedCategories. It was deleted by you per G6, and salted to prevent re-creation. I took a look through "What links here" to see if I could get any context behind this, to no avail. In any case, is there any particular reason this category should not be re-created so it stops showing up in redlink cleanup reports? I would say either the category needs to be restored or all the members removed from the category if there's some legitimate reason it shouldn't be created. Thanks, VegaDark (talk) 22:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I think there was a good reason for salting it, but I cannot remember 7 years back for this specific action to be honest. Sorry, <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 20:59, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Fair enough - would you agree that the category as-is is not ideal? It sounds like the members should probably be removed from the category if there was a good reason for salting it. VegaDark (talk) 00:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news
 * A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
 * Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
 * Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news
 * When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
 * Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
 * The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries
 * JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

John Ossoff close
I am curious as to your reasoning here. There seems to be a pretty strong consensus that NPOL does apply in this case (8 delete or redirect and protect) vs 4 Keeps of which one is the SPA author and one is two are revived dormant account s .Even discounting that the consensus that NPOL applies seems overwhelming. Thank you. Jbh Talk  15:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I have opened a deletion review on this topic.  Jbh  Talk  13:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for writing. I'm a bit busy, so apologies if I don't respond at DRV for the next few days. Drop me a note if you haven't heard from me in two days. Best. <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 22:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi NW, pinging you again on the DRV. Hobit (talk) 20:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Ping from me too. After making a highly contentious close, it would be helpful if you could respond to the questions being asked about that close.  -- RoySmith (talk) 14:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi. I know the DRV is over, but I think it would still be useful for you to make some comment here giving insight to why you chose this particular AfD to close, and why you came to the decision you did.  I feel obligated to point out that WP:ADMINACCT has a Failure to communicate clause.  I am concerned that you seem to be disregarding that obligation.  -- RoySmith (talk) 13:21, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi NW, pinging you again.  Hobit (talk) 12:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Markblock script
Hi! I want to notify you that I made this edit. We now have a "markblocked" gadget which can be enabled in preferences. The Russian script is not needed any more. The gadget code was updated recently, and the Russian code is not updated, so it is not working any more (you can read more about that here). But, many users still use the Russian version by importing from your page (User:NuclearWarfare/Mark-blocked script.js). Therefore, I edited your page so that it imports the code directly from the updated gadget. That way, it should be working even for those who do not enable the gadget, but import the code from you. I hope it's OK with you.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  12:05, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

TM ARCA
You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, Manul ~ talk 17:49, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Arbitration clarification request archived
The Transcendental Meditation movement arbitration clarification request of May 2017, which you were listed as a party to, has been closed and archived. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 06:40, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/41.138.78.16
80.132.83.91 (talk) 05:42, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Comedian rush limbaugh listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Comedian rush limbaugh. Since you had some involvement with the Comedian rush limbaugh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.

You are encouraged to change
 * : <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk )

to
 * :  NW  ( Talk )

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 22:56, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Patrick J. Deneen
Hello. Could you please let me know why this was deleted--did they ask for it to be deleted? The subject is notable and should have an article...Zigzig20s (talk) 14:41, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't have OTRS access anymore but I believe the creator of the article requested its deletion. If you believe he meets notability criteria, please feel free to create a new article for him.  NW  ( Talk ) 12:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Amanda Scarborough
Hello, I noticed you deleted the Amanda Scarborough article back in 2009 due to being a "non-notable college athlete." Assuming that article was about the softball player, it turns out that Scarborough actually does meet WP:NCOLLATH, because she won first-team NFCA (National Fastpitch Coaches Association) All-American honors in 2005 and 2007, thus meeting the criteria for winning a national award. She also won softball Player of the Year award in 2005 from the Big 12 Conference, a major NCAA Division I Conference, possibly another way she meets NCOLLATH. So I wonder where "not competed at the highest level" came from.

After graduating from college, Scarborough went on to be a softball game commentator for ESPN and has gotten outside media attention for her work there.

Could you please advise if this evidence is enough to undelete that article? Thanks, Arbor to SJ (talk) 23:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Mill Demo photograph in Villa Rica, Georgia Copyright
I took the photograph and I own the copyright. It is posted with my permission and knowledge. Ernest Everett Blevins (talk) 03:25, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Page move of BPL
Hello, NuclearWarfare! you have moved the page Below Poverty Line → Below Poverty Line (India) with edit summary : see talk, I couldnot find any discussion of the move on the concerned talk page. Below Poverty Line is the official title by the Government and precise enough as per WP:TITLE, the disambiguation (India) is not needed. I tried to move the page back but apparently only administrators can. Can you please make the move? regards, DRAGON BOOSTER   ★  07:23, 8 October 2018 (UTC).
 * Done.  NW  ( Talk ) 13:20, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

West Africa Ebola virus epidemic
Hi this is to inform you that West African Ebola virus epidemic which you edited will be submitted for WikiJournal of Medicine...''The objective of this message is to invite the contributors to collaboratively submit the article for review through Wiki.J.Med, and if possible, to help in further betterment of the article in accordance to the suggestions of the reviewers. Wikipedia articles are collaboratively authored. So, it is very important to make the authors aware of such a process that the article is currently undergoing'' thanks--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular
<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;"> <span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular"> <div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none"> <div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;">

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:46, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Happy Dashain!
<div style="color:#b55a50; box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.35); border-radius: 1px;"> <div style="text-align:center; font-size: 36px; margin-top: 24px;margin-left: 16px; font-family: 'Linux Libertine',Georgia,Times,serif; line-height: 1.2em;">Namaste, NuclearWarfare, and Happy Dashain! WikiProject Nepal wishes you a wonderful Dashain filled with joy, love, and happiness. Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great Dashain! Cheers. Message sent by on behalf of WikiProject Nepal. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

"Wikipedia:REFLIST" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect REFLIST. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:REFLIST redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:39, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:00, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement
22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, NuclearWarfare!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! NuclearWarfare, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 16:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 16:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

FAR for United States Academic Decathlon
I have nominated United States Academic Decathlon for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 16:32, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

"Video log" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Video_log&redirect=no Video log] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. <b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.0em 0.0em 0.1em;">CycloneYoris</b> <b style="color:purple">talk!</b> 22:21, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Small request
Hello, I'm correcting a tracked syntax error on Wikipedia called the Tidy Font bug, and two of your full protected pages each have one occurrence of this error. If you'd be willing, would you change your signature at the bottom of User:NuclearWarfare/Speedy and User talk:NuclearWarfare/Editnotice from

NW  ( Talk )

to your current (and error-free) signature

 NW  ( Talk ) ? When links are written in the link format with the color specified outside of the link, browsers don't agree on how to display this. Some browsers display it with the specified colors, and others default back to the standard link blue. If you are willing to adjust these two occurrences, it would be much appreciated.

Thank you, Zinnober9 (talk) 19:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅  Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:34, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

July music
Listening to Siegfried from the 2023 Bayreuth Festival, third act, Andreas Schager as Siegfried waking up Brünnhilde, reminded me of this discussion. Was there anything in it demanding arbitration? - A few weeks later, three participants were admonished, - for what still remains a mystery to me? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Today Jahrhundertring, and I'm listening to Götterdämmerung from Bayreuth (pictured), - the image (of a woman who can't believe what she has to see) features also on the article talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:46, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

"Notintendedtobeafactualstatement" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Notintendedtobeafactualstatement&redirect=no Notintendedtobeafactualstatement] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:5D43:2887:B701:6DAA (talk) 22:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Liancourt Rocks probation
Template:Liancourt Rocks probation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. <span style="font-family:monospace,Courier;color:#414245">#prodraxis connect 17:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SCW&ISIL sanctions
Template:SCW&ISIL sanctions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SCW&ISIL sanctions
Template:SCW&ISIL sanctions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC)