User talk:Number.6.freeman

Welcome!
Hello, Number.6.freeman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  15:19, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * The Wikipedia tutorial

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Number.6.freeman! Thank you for your contributions. I am TheOriginalSoni and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! TheOriginalSoni (talk) 15:19, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Hello
Hello - Just to give you a heads up, I am more than just a "voice" :) In fact, believe it or not, I have an entire body that is ALIVE!! :D

Also, do tell me if you need help finding the video tutorials on Wikipedia. There are plenty of them, and I know where they are ;)

Cheers, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 12:11, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * eek! it's alive!


 * so far, so good...i'm beginning to get the feel of the place. altho i do have one question about this talk format--i am answering you here on my own talk.  should i be answering you back on your own talk--will you even see it here?


 * as i continue to learn, i will prob have other questions, and will prob need to find some more of those vids. am glad to know there's a friendly voice...er...body to call on.  thanks again :)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Number.6.freeman‎ (talk • contribs)


 * Soni is probably watching this page, but you can go to his user talkpage and leave the code  at the bottom if you want to let him know you've replied (it creates a pre-made message directing him here). Just as a note, if you want to keep your identity a secret (most folk here do) it's inadvisable to edit whilst logged out; it reveals your IP address which in turn reveals your real-world location. In case you're concerned, I've removed the edits you made while logged out from your history, so your IP is hidden from view. All the best, Yunshui  雲 &zwj; 水  14:27, 22 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Yunshui, good save--thanks for watching my backside! i didn't notice until you pointed that out--i had seen the ip addy and thought i did something wrong, so i went back and re-edited by making sure i put in the 4 tildes. however, i guess i was so certain i had done it right the next time that i didn't look at the signature.  my bad.
 * Number.6.freeman (talk) 02:14, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Yunshui-- same as TOS -- if/when you have time, could you review the stubby article in my sandbox while i'm waiting for my it to get to the top of the queue? as i said to TOS, i don't believe i made any fatal editorial mistakes on it, altho i probably made editorial errors (i did try to read anything that was related, but, man... there is so much to keep in my head lol).  and again, i will work to improve it while it sits in the queue.  i would very much appreciate if you, could look at the page and offer any suggestions you also may have.  i'm exhausted from doing an all-nighter on that little page.  please keep in mind that i haven't dealt with the material in years.  this was one of those instances where i went to look it up in wiki to see how the political analysts were comparing that era to today's, and was shocked to find it wasn't on here at all--totally missing (i hope no user has purposely deleted it out at some point).  so, i figured it would be a good 'trial by fire' as you are encouraging us to do lol
 * Number.6.freeman (talk) 13:08, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * As Yunshui already explained, you can always leave a Talkback (the ) if you are not sure the other person sees your reply or not. But no worries. I am watching your page anyways, and so I can see whenever anyone changes your page. You could also reply back on my page (Some actually prefer that), but I like keeping conversations together.
 * ANyways, happy editing :) TheOriginalSoni (talk) 16:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you too, TheOriginalSoni. where should i be putting the 'talkback' code?  i tried it on my reply to Yunshui by putting it at the end of the text.  i will try it with you by putting it after my sig.  hope at least one of them works. lol
 * Number.6.freeman (talk) 02:14, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The talkback code should be placed at the talk page of whoever you are replying to. It is to inform them that you have replied to them. And it is supposed to be placed without the "code" and the "nowiki" portions. Just the "tb" between the two brackets. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 06:16, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 * okay... but where on (the bottom of) your talk page, then? should it be a new post, or is there a place to put it?
 * also, i have now sent my stubby page off to wait in line. if/when you have time, could you review the article in my sandbox while i'm waiting for my article to get to the top of the queue?  because this article is so short, plus it's going to take weeks for a submission to get seen and approved, i went ahead and submitted it since i don't believe i made any fatal editorial mistakes on it.  as it suggested, i will work to improve it while it sits in the queue.  i would very much appreciate if you could look at the page and offer any suggestions you may have.  i worked 15 straight hours (all night) on just this little page, trying to make sure it's right.
 * Number.6.freeman (talk) 12:42, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes. And you may choose either one.
 * I added a lot of comments inside the article itself. Sorry but I got carried away and went to quite in-depth. Also, I should have simply made them into a list externally. Hope you find the critique helpful.
 * Cheers, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 14:30, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * LOL! yes, you did go into great depth. trouble is...while i agree with your prompts for more info, as i said...i'm not a content expert here.  this is just a stub that i'm hoping someone else who knows the info better can flesh out.  so, i'm not exactly sure how to fix or embellish a lot of the info you wanted.  i will certainly move the extra resources at the end into citations within the body--that i can do.  i had put those there in case someone else wanted or needed them--they didn't seem to have anything unique, but they are legitimate references.  given the subject wasn't even covered at all yet in wiki, i wanted to make sure to give the key references i had found so people would know they were out there.
 * you see, when you do an online search on the subject, what you get are pages of references that all quote the same couple of sources--and all of those sources are quick summaries without naming the group members. it took me hours (and i managed to recruit someone to help search for a while) just to find the couple of reliable references that actually named names and gave enough history that i could figure out who's who.  and then, once i found the references, some of the people who were there at the time seemed to want to take credit in their later memoirs for being the one who was responsible for forming the group.  i had to go back to the earliest reference to see what was being said by those who were more objective and closer to the time that it happened.  that then left me with basically one very detailed article by an outsider, and i couldn't just paraphrase that article.  so, i was only able to use the scant amount of info that was common and corroborated by all sources.
 * the most important question i have is... where to make the edits. i don't want to destroy your edits--where do i begin to fix it up?  okay--i think i see that the edits are made as comments only, and only show up in the edit mode.  so, i believe i've got the answer to that?
 * also, is there a way i can go over these improvements with you chat-style so i can figure out how to fix them? i would like to get this right.
 * Number.6.freeman (talk) 15:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I checked into the talkback. It appears you've got to use instead.
 * Thats all right. I dont know why i got so carried away while I was going through your article.
 * Yes. I made the edits specifically for that reason. I moved them to the talk page (User talk:Number.6.freeman/sandbox), so it will be much more easier and efficient to work with. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2013 (UTC)


 * read your mssg--thanks! you are prob plenty busy, but you should know that i have plans for today, so i won't be around.  you will next see me tonight or tomorrow.  i will be able to concentrate on it then.  thank you, again.
 * Number.6.freeman (talk) 12:41, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * It worked! Congratulations. And feel free to check those points anytime you like.
 * P.S. I might become a little busy in the next few days; and so if you dont find me answering, just go to the Teahouse. They'll be there to help :)
 * Cheers, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 12:57, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Have Some FUN
Hi, N6Freeman. An experienced Wikipedia editor known as Pluma created a page of fun stuff(<-click on it) for his adoptees. Although he's too busy to adopt any newcomers right now, you can still learn a lot from his page and have fun doing so. When you edit and create your user page, your signature will turn from red to blue. You will get editing experience with no fear because it's your page. You can even cut-and-paste there to help promote the Teahouse.

You might choose to define yourself as a member of the WikiFauna. Perhaps you were or are a WikiPuppy aspiring to become a WikiDragon. Look at the bottom of those pages for a list of WikiFauna. Are you one of them? Have some WikiFun and take care, DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·cont) Join WER 02:45, 23 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Doc! sounds really intriguing.  i will surely investigate.  right now, i'm on a mission to put up a whole new page.  i had gone to look something up, and it's not even in wiki.  it's archived in several museum collections, but not a word about it on wiki.  go figure.  so, i'm reading up about wiki as much as i can before i take the plunge...not to mention that i am having to compile all the info without being an expert in the field.  therefore, it will be a bit of a stub, but i want to get most of the key facts in there in case no one else touches it for a while.  i don't know why i am being this conscientious about something that isn't that important to me...don't ask because it's a mystery to me too. lol  i think it's partially because it gives me the chance to learn about wiki while getting a critical piece of history into wiki that's been missing.  okay...gotta get back to work.
 * Number.6.freeman (talk) 04:34, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Young Turks (politics), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 21:58, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Disambiguation link notification for March 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Young Turks (U.S. politics), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:10, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hello, I Love You, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 45 rpm. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Demis Roussos song
Hi! I have a question about a single titled "Midnight Is the Time I Need You" that you added to Demis Roussos's discography:. I've tried to find a source for the claim that the single appeared on the Billboard disco singles chart, but I couldn't. Where do you know that from? Could you find a source? --Moscow Connection (talk) 20:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Hmm...that was in 2015, and i am trying to remember where i had seen that chart. I have many of the actual physical copies of the old Billboard disco charts archived in my locker.  I had moved lockers in 2015, so it makes sense that i saw it at that time, but i could have seen it somewhere else.  I had thought the info was easily available online, so i did not make an effort to archive a digital image of the page (wherever i saw it).
 * but, i agree -- i just spent an hour trying to find a reference online, and it's not there. In fact, i could not find the old disco (dance/club) charts on the current billboard site earlier than 2012 (i think it is). [sigh]
 * Please understand that i don't contribute to wiki very often, and when i do, it's because i see missing facts. I surely did have a verifiable reference at the time of my posting.  I know this because i had NO clue what the actual chart number was, so without that reference, i would not have been able to specify how it charted at number 12.  this is frustrating for me.  I will have to go search my locker, but that will take time, of course.  I will definitely look.  Thank you for asking :)

Number.6.freeman (talk) 22:14, 1 November 2017 (UTC)