User talk:Number238

August 2015
Hello, I'm Piguy101. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Chicago White Sox because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. π♂101 (talk) 17:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nick Ruff


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Nick Ruff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. &mdash;George8211 / T 17:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chicago White Sox, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. π♂101 (talk) 17:31, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Govindaharihari (talk) 17:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Milwaukee Brewers. π♂101 (talk) 17:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bill Dinneen has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:31, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bill Dinneen was changed by Number238 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953602 on 2015-09-01T23:31:44+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Madison Bumgarner. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Milwaukee Brewers, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Milwaukee Brewers was changed by Number238 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967112 on 2015-09-01T23:35:43+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ruff filed


A tag has been placed on Ruff filed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Ruff filed. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)