User talk:Number 2 thousand

I created 22222 (not 2000)

Speedy deletion nomination of 11111


A tag has been placed on 11111 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Skäpperöd (talk) 18:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 11111


The article 11111 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet the notability benchmark set by Notability (numbers)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gandalf61 (talk) 09:10, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 22222


The article 22222 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not meet the notability benchmark set by Notability (numbers)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gandalf61 (talk) 09:10, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deletapedia


The article Deletapedia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unsourced neologism; WP:NOTDICT

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Feezo (Talk) 10:16, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Proposed deletion, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Wikipedia:Proposed deletion. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:37, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  11:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 1000000000000


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as 1000000000000, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  11:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

INappropriate pages
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Canterbury Tail  talk  11:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  11:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Run-of-the-mill


The article Run-of-the-mill has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 12:42, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Run-of-the-mill for deletion
The article Run-of-the-mill is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Run-of-the-mill until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  15:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:5 digit numbers
Template:5 digit numbers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 16:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)