User talk:Number S1x

November 2017
Hello, I'm Marianna251. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Classic Game Room have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 23:33, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Reference
>one or more of your recent contributions to Classic Game Room have been undone because they appeared to be promotional

My reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angry_Video_Game_Nerd#Videography

A table with title, date, format. My goal.

My data:

CGR Collector's Series 001: Mario Bros. Review for Atari 7800 - Published April 10, 2017 - 30 pages - paperback and kindle formats. How To Make A Video Game Review Show That Doesn't Suck - Published April 20, 2017 - 116 pages - paperback and kindle formats. CGR Collector's Series 002: The Revenge of Shinobi Review for Sega Genesis - Published May 15, 2017 - 42 pages - paperback and kindle formats. Ultra Massive Video Game Console Guide Volume 1 - Published July 25, 2017 - 230 pages - paperback and kindle formats. Ultra Massive Video Game Console Guide Volume 2 - Published October 15, 2017 - 226 pages - paperback and kindle formats. Pac-Man Collector's Guide: A Definitive Review - Published October 30, 2017 - 101 pages - paperback and kindle formats.

Title, date, format. I added a page count. And I like the bullet list more than the table.

Aside from format and subject details I see no difference between the presentation of the two sets of data.

Please explain... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Number S1x (talk • contribs) 00:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Your edit added external links to Amazon into the page, making the text you added into something you'd find in a sales catalogue. While I appreciate that you wanted to improve the article, your edit was not appropriate for an encyclopaedia. Take a look at "What Wikipedia is not" for more information. Hope that helps. Marianna251TALK 02:48, 10 November 2017 (UTC)