User talk:Numouno/sandbox

You're off to a terrific start with this draft, so what I'm suggesting are minor edits: This Gospel contains the books: Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. since you mention it earlier The last style is Italian and it was called Mediterranean. This style helped put the Frankish church in a better relationship with Rome. so wordsmith a little more Please touch base with any questions!
 * because you're discussing it as a single mss, I think the correct subject verb agreement would be Trier Gospels was rather than were (as a medieval art historian, that's how I see it used in sentences about gospel book mss)
 * Scribes would be more accurate than Authors as a subhead (technically the gospel bk writers are the authors)
 * No doubt you were going to fine-tune it all anyway, but this part in particular needs some clarification: "Insular scribe and artist, as well as, some Mediterranean inspired art"
 * similarly, add "styles" or a similar word after "Merovingian and Insular" at end of that paragraph
 * For the content section, you can leave out
 * respectively instead of respectfully
 * THis part makes an important point
 * maybe give an example of a similar image to anchor the point :Then there is a portrait of Matthew that follows extremely closely with previous Roman manuscripts that were produced with the same Mediterranean style
 * fortunately there are already some images of the mss in Wikimedia Commons, so it should be easy to add some of them to your entry.
 * ideally you'd have more than one source, but I understand since it's the main book on the topic why you went that route
 * you do a good job of adding links throughout to other Wikipedia entries

AMcClanan (talk) 22:12, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Article Evaluation
Your page seems to be formatted well so far. I have only a couple of suggestions and comments. I notice there is only one resource for your information. I thought this might be an issue, but I see that our professor has already touched on that. I would love to see examples of the illustrations from this manuscript. Images would add quite a bit of interest to the page, and also help the viewer to recognize the piece in the future. The links all seem to work fine, and overall, I think the page is coming along nicely. I look forward to seeing it published! Jodijansen (talk) 20:43, 27 November 2018 (UTC)Jodijansen

Really great start! The first question I have while reading it, though, is who is Thomas. Maybe a brief explanation by the first mention of his name. Is he someone we should know of or just some person lost to history, I don't know. Breaking it up a little bit could improve the flow but overall, it is very informativeOttangel (talk) 08:01, 28 November 2018 (UTC).

From Prof McClanan, 12/3
Quick note: I'm not seeing the Unit 2 edit a Wikipedia entry (1 pt), so please email me if I overlooked it, thank you.

AMcClanan (talk) 02:36, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Feedback from Prof McClanan, 12/7
Thanks for your work on this expansion.

AMcClanan (talk) 23:06, 7 December 2018 (UTC)