User talk:Nurebz001

July 2024
Hello Nurebz001. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Nurebz001. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.   [[User:CanonNi ]]  (talk • contribs) 08:16, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

More accurately, you have engaged in meat puppetry by attempting to edit after your two paid editors were each blocked. 331dot (talk) 08:19, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Just FYI, the most recent freelancer hired to create the page was not blocked because they were "assumed to be the same person," but due to a previous track record of abusing multiple accounts. I wouldn't be surprised if they are still instructing you, as their profile shows the job marked as completed, meaning they are technically still working on it; otherwise, it would have been terminated. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 06:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * We don't do "minimal, non-promotional pages", as Wikipedia is not a directory of businesses that exist. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with articles about topics that meet our criteria, such as a notable company.  Your company's buildings gettighg recognition and awards might merit the buildings articles, but not the company itself.  For the company itself to merit an article, it must receive significant coverage itself showing how it is a notable company.  Other companies meriting articles(if they do, they may not, and they just haven't been removed yet) does not automatically mean your company does too. Each draft or article is considered on its own merits, not based on the presence of other articles. 331dot (talk) 07:59, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * GSS: If a freelancer did not follow Wiki policies, our company should not be penalized. Address the freelancer's actions, not us. Hiring a consultant is allowed if they disclose paid editing, which our consultant did. He was blocked for suspected sockpuppetry, an issue unrelated to us. It's unfair to punish our company for the actions of freelancers. You initiated the deletion of this draft, indicating frustration with paid editors. I can verify my company representation with a company email. I have confirmed with our marketing people that we no longer work with the freelancer. Below I have gathered some articles that may help you decide the company's notability.  https://theedgemalaysia.com/article/design-works-pushing-back-boundaries-design
 * https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/article/15-works-of-rsp-architects-every-architect-should-visit/ https://theedgemalaysia.com/article/design-works-pushing-back-boundaries-design https://www.adfwebmagazine.jp/en/architect/rsp-a
 * https://www.scmp.com/country-reports/country-reports/topics/singapore-national-day-report-august-2019/article/3021102
 * https://design-middleeast.com/powerlist-architects-30-michael-magill-managing-and-creative-director-rsp/  About a director but also has a lot of info about the company
 * https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/designing-green-sustainable-buildings-key-spores-top-young-architects
 * https://www.scmp.com/country-reports/country-reports/topics/singapore-national-day-report-august-2019/article/3021105
 * https://panelsfurnitureasia.com/rsp-refreshes-brand-identity-charts-new-expertise-ecosystem-to-pioneer-growth-in-built-environment-sector/ Nurebz001 (talk) 00:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * @Nurebz001 have you not read the meatpuppetry policy, which states that actively recruiting new accounts or users on Wikipedia, or recruiting people (either on-wiki or off-wiki) to create an account or edit anonymously in order to influence decisions on Wikipedia, is prohibited? As an employee, you are strongly discouraged to write about your company. Wikipedia is not for promotion.   [[User:CanonNi ]]  (talk • contribs) 02:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * These sources are
 * an interview with a staff person, not an independent source
 * a list of projects the company worked on, not significant coverage
 * describing an industry award the company received, this only contributes to notability if the award itself merits an article (like Nobel Peace Prize or Academy Award or Grammy Award)
 * interviews with staff, and the author is given as "advertising partner", meaning it was written by the company itself
 * not significant coverage of the company, it's about an architect
 * is more about the building than the company itself, and contains an interview with the designing architect from the company
 * is another interview and lists "advertising partner" as the author
 * documents a routine business activity, a logo update
 * None of these establish notability. 331dot (talk) 07:32, 4 July 2024 (UTC)