User talk:Nurse2Be

December 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sources only say India has selected the Seahawk, not competed an order (signed a contract) yet. This difference can be a far apart. -Fnlayson (talk) 04:00, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

May 2015
Your recent editing history at Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - BilCat (talk) 14:15, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User:Fnlayson— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 13:56, 22 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Your sources do not support listing as Saudi Arabia as an operator in Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk. The sources only state it as a proposed Foreign Military Sale now (see, ).  A contract must be finalized and signed to complete an order. If you want to discuss this further start a discussion on the article's talk page. -Fnlayson (talk) 14:55, 22 May 2015 (UTC)